This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Introduction to Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk

In: Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
James Bessen (Boston University School of Law)
Michael J. Meurer (Boston University)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

In the last several years, business leaders, policymakers, and inventors have complained to the media and to Congress that today’s patent system stifles innovation instead of fostering it. But like the infamous patent on the peanut butter and jelly sandwich, much of the cited evidence about the patent system is pure anecdote--making realistic policy formation difficult. Is the patent system fundamentally broken, or can it be fixed with a few modest reforms? Moving beyond rhetoric, Patent Failure provides the first authoritative and comprehensive look at the economic performance of patents in forty years. James Bessen and Michael Meurer ask whether patents work well as property rights, and, if not, what institutional and legal reforms are necessary to make the patent system more effective. Patent Failure presents a wide range of empirical evidence from history, law, and economics. The book’s findings are stark and conclusive. While patents do provide incentives to invest in research, development, and commercialization, for most businesses today, patents fail to provide predictable property rights. Instead, they produce costly disputes and excessive litigation that outweigh positive incentives. Only in some sectors, such as the pharmaceutical industry, do patents act as advertised, with their benefits outweighing the related costs. By showing how the patent system has fallen short in providing predictable legal boundaries, Patent Failure serves as a call for change in institutions and laws. There are no simple solutions, but Bessen and Meurer’s reform proposals need to be heard. The health and competitiveness of the nation’s economy depend on it.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s8634.html
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s8634.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
This chapter was published in: James Bessen & Michael J. Meurer Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, , pages , 2008.

This item is provided by Princeton University Press in its series Introductory Chapters with number 8634-1.

Handle: RePEc:pup:chapts:8634-1

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://press.princeton.edu

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Chuck Creesy).

Related research
Keywords: patent system; public policy; economic performance; property rights;

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer with RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.