IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/sopchp/978-0-230-52366-1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The New Politics of the Welfare State in a Developmental Context: Explaining the 1990s Social Care Expansion in Japan

In: Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Ito Peng

Abstract

The welfare state policy expansion in Japan in the 1990s has been some-thing of an oddity when one considers the significant economic pressures on the government to restrain fiscal spending, and the international trend of welfare retrenchment. This chapter examines the politics of welfare state expansion in Japan during the 1990s, and assesses the impacts of civil society engagement in public policy making in shaping social policy outcomes. The chapter consists of two main sections and a conclusion. The first section outlines the development of the Japanese welfare state policies in the light of political, economic and social factors that have affected the changes in state’s social policies. I argue that, although compelling, the developmental state view can offer only a partial explanation of welfare state development in Japan. The evidence for the developmental state seems strongest for the period up to the early postwar years. After the 1960s, however, the develop-mental state perspective becomes increasingly challenged by inconsistencies in social policy development. With increasing evidence of civil society engagements in shaping social policies and of politicians’ sensitivities to electoral trends at different times, I contend that it would be more fruitful to analyse the development of Japanese welfare state from the perspective of a gradual shift from a developmentalist to a more democratic and pluralistic political model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ito Peng, 2005. "The New Politics of the Welfare State in a Developmental Context: Explaining the 1990s Social Care Expansion in Japan," Social Policy in a Development Context, in: Huck-ju Kwon (ed.), Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia, chapter 3, pages 73-97, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:sopchp:978-0-230-52366-1_4
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230523661_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:sopchp:978-0-230-52366-1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.