IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/psifcp/978-3-030-71693-6_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conclusion

In: Sustainability Rating Agencies vs Credit Rating Agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Cash

    (Aston University)

Abstract

The conclusion brings together the dominant strands within the book and demonstrates the interconnectedness between them. The trajectories of two of the leading political components within the Western development of the concept of sustainable finance are pursuing particular and different objectives, but neither have a strong chance of success. The American trajectory has dismissed the usage of ESG within the financial services (although that may change under the Biden Administration, whilst this also highlights the fragmented development of the American experience), and Europe has pursued a progressive agenda that is more ideologically sound than it is practical, with obvious consequences regarding a lack of authority to truly impose the model of sustainable financial practice now coming to bear. The two developments are actively impacting the battle to serve the mainstream investor. Yet, some private developments are reviewed and concluded here and adjoined to the chances of success for the two industries the book focuses on.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Cash, 2021. "Conclusion," Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance, in: Sustainability Rating Agencies vs Credit Rating Agencies, chapter 0, pages 143-145, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:psifcp:978-3-030-71693-6_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-71693-6_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:psifcp:978-3-030-71693-6_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.