IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-37528-4_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Human Capital and Earnings: British Evidence and a Critique (1979)

In: Tackling Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • G. Psacharopoulos

Abstract

What is the private rate of return to schooling and to on-the-job training? And how far does human capital explain the inequality of earnings? We try to answer these questions for Britain for a random sample of about 7000 employed males. Basically, we use the framework of Mincer (1974), but at some important points we find this unsatisfactory, and offer our own critique.1 In Mincer’s regression approach log earnings are regressed on schooling, work experience and experience squared. (The effects of experience are held to reflect the influence of costly investment in on-the-job training.) But this method only yields valid estimates of the direct effects of schooling on earnings if there is no relationship between schooling and the amount of post-school investment and its profitability. A necessary (though not sufficient) condition for this to be true is that the profiles of log-earnings, as experience varies, are vertically parallel for all schooling groups. Casual inspection is not sufficient to verify whether this is so. So the obvious approach is to specify a model in which the pattern of post-school investment and its profitability are allowed to depend on schooling. Such a model also allows one to estimate the rate of return to on-the-job training.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Psacharopoulos, 1999. "Human Capital and Earnings: British Evidence and a Critique (1979)," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Tackling Inequality, chapter 8, pages 126-154, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37528-4_8
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230375284_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37528-4_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.