IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-36734-0_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Role of Housework in Everyday Life: Another Aspect of Consumption in Modern Japan

In: The Historical Consumer

Author

Listed:
  • Masayuki Tanimoto

Abstract

What determines the level of utility that people derive from their everyday lives? There is no doubt that the consumption of goods — necessities and luxuries — is primary in considering the utility level of ordinary people. However, tangible goods are not the only objects consumed. Various kinds of ‘services’ also have a great influence on the level of individual utility. Specifically, before the ‘contemporary’ age, services delivered inside the household made up an important part of the overall consumption. These services have mainly been provided by means of ‘housework’ in a broad sense. The purpose of this chapter is to shed light on the practice of housework in modern Japan from the point of view of consumption history.1

Suggested Citation

  • Masayuki Tanimoto, 2012. "The Role of Housework in Everyday Life: Another Aspect of Consumption in Modern Japan," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Penelope Francks & Janet Hunter (ed.), The Historical Consumer, chapter 2, pages 27-55, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-36734-0_2
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230367340_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Penelope Francks, 2022. "Industriousness and divergence: Living standards, housework and the Japanese diet in comparative historical perspective," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 26-46, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-36734-0_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.