IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/rpeczz/s0161-7230(04)22007-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Testing Okishio’S Criterion Of Technical Choice

In: The Capitalist State and Its Economy: Democracy in Socialism

Author

Listed:
  • Cheol-Soo Park

Abstract

Okishio’s theorem plays an important role in modern discussions of Marx’s argument on the long-run tendency for the rate of profit to fall. Even though there is substantial literature dealing with Okishio’s theorem, there has been little discussion of Okishio’s theorem from an empirical perspective. This paper makes an attempt to empirically test Okishio’s criterion of technical choice, which is an important assumption of Okishio’s theorem. By using the World Penn Tables data on selected OECD countries, I will consider how well Okishio’s criterion of technical choice predicts the evolution of actual capitalist economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheol-Soo Park, 2005. "Testing Okishio’S Criterion Of Technical Choice," Research in Political Economy, in: The Capitalist State and Its Economy: Democracy in Socialism, pages 199-208, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:rpeczz:s0161-7230(04)22007-7
    DOI: 10.1016/S0161-7230(04)22007-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0161-7230(04)22007-7/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0161-7230(04)22007-7/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0161-7230(04)22007-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rpeczz:s0161-7230(04)22007-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.