IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/reinzz/s1049-2585(04)11003-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

How Manipulable Are Fairness Perceptions? The Effect Of Additional Alternatives

In: Inequality, Welfare and Income Distribution: Experimental Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Yoella Bereby-Meyer
  • Brit Grosskopf

Abstract

In customer or labor markets raising prices or cutting wages is perceived as unfair if it results from the exploitation of shifts in demands. In a series of manipulations we show that adding an alternative to the original choice set alters the perception of fairness of the final outcome. Adding a worse alternative lowers the perception of unfairness, whereas adding a better alternative raises the perception of unfairness. These findings supplemented with existing experimental evidence cast doubt on purely outcome-based theories of fairness and suggest that fairness perceptions are highly manipulable.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoella Bereby-Meyer & Brit Grosskopf, 2004. "How Manipulable Are Fairness Perceptions? The Effect Of Additional Alternatives," Research on Economic Inequality, in: Inequality, Welfare and Income Distribution: Experimental Approaches, pages 43-53, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:reinzz:s1049-2585(04)11003-x
    DOI: 10.1016/S1049-2585(04)11003-X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S1049-2585(04)11003-X/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S1049-2585(04)11003-X/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S1049-2585(04)11003-X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:reinzz:s1049-2585(04)11003-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.