IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/16974_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Bridging Original and New Institutional Economics?

In: Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism

Author

Listed:
  • John Groenewegen

Abstract

Geoff Hodgson’s long-standing critique of the methodological individualism characteristic of both the mainstream and the new institutional economics revolves around the view that the economy is an open, evolving system in which actors and structures are mutually constituted. This position was instrumental in the formation of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy in 1988. It also runs through Hodgson’s defence of the habit-based conception of agency characteristic of the original institutional economics and his proposals of various non-efficiency explanations of the firm. The chapter shows that the boundaries between the original and the new institutional economics have more recently become blurred, to the point that it is no longer useful to differentiate between the two. Institutional economics can be usefully seen as belonging to a continuum along which different schools of thought are more complements than substitutes. This opens the door for multiple opportunities for mutual learning.

Suggested Citation

  • John Groenewegen, 2019. "Bridging Original and New Institutional Economics?," Chapters, in: Francesca Gagliardi & David Gindis (ed.), Institutions and Evolution of Capitalism, chapter 7, pages 93-109, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:16974_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781785364990/9781785364990.00016.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angela Ambrosino & Paolo Silvestri, 2020. "Hodgson: An Institution Across Disciplinary Barriers," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 54(2), pages 329-348, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economics and Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:16974_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.