Martina Garau

Personal Details

First Name:	Martina
Middle Name:
Last Name:	Garau
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:	pga966
	[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Office of Health Economics

London, United Kingdom
http://www.ohe.org/
RePEc:edi:ohecouk (more details at EDIRC)

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:

1. Chris Sampson;Martina Garau, 2019. "How Should We Measure Quality of Life Impact in Rare Disease? Recent Learnings in Spinal Muscular Atrophy," Briefing 002146, Office of Health Economics.

   Mentioned in:

   1. Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 7th September 2020
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2020-09-07 11:00:07

Working papers

1. Chris Sampson;Martina Garau, 2019. "How Should We Measure Quality of Life Impact in Rare Disease? Recent Learnings in Spinal Muscular Atrophy," Briefing 002146, Office of Health Economics.

   Cited by:

   1. Amanda Whittal & Michela Meregaglia & Elena Nicod, 2021. "The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rare Diseases and Implications for Health Technology Assessment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(5), pages 485-503, September.
   2. C. Simone Sutherland & Pollyanna Hudson & Stephen Mitchell & Noman Paracha, 2022. "Systematic Literature Review to Identify Utility Values in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) and Their Caregivers," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 39-67, April.
   3. Noman Paracha & Pollyanna Hudson & Stephen Mitchell & C. Simone Sutherland, 2022. "Systematic Literature Review to Assess the Cost and Resource Use Associated with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Management," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 11-38, April.

2. Margherita Neri;Adrian Towse;Martina Garau, 2018. "Multi-Indication Pricing (MIP): Practical Solutions and Steps to Move Forward," Briefing 002084, Office of Health Economics.

   Cited by:

   1. Daniel Tobias Michaeli & Mackenzie Mills & Panos Kanavos, 2022. "Value and Price of Multi-indication Cancer Drugs in the USA, Germany, France, England, Canada, Australia, and Scotland," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 757-768, September.
   2. Carlos Campillo-Artero & Jaume Puig-Junoy & José Luis Segú-Tolsa & Marta Trapero-Bertran, 2020. "Price Models for Multi-indication Drugs: A Systematic Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 47-56, February.
   3. Michaeli, Daniel Tobias & Mills, Mackenzie & Kanavos, Panos, 2022. "Value and price of multi-indication cancer drugs in the USA, Germany, France, England, Canada, Australia, and Scotland," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115720, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
   4. Rosella Levaggi & Paolo Pertile, 2020. "Value-Based Pricing Alternatives for Personalised Drugs: Implications of Asymmetric Information and Competition," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 357-362, June.

3. Patricia Danzon;Martina Garau;Adrian Towse, 2011. "Pharmaceutical Pricing in Europe: Is Differential Pricing a Win-Win Solution?," Occasional Paper 000191, Office of Health Economics.

   Cited by:

   1. Afschin Gandjour, 2013. "Reference Pricing and Price Negotiations for Innovative New Drugs," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 11-14, January.
   2. Sabine Vogler, 2019. "Fair prices for medicines? Exploring competent authorities’ and public payers’ preferences on pharmaceutical policies," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 46(3), pages 443-469, August.

4. Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz;Martina Garau, 2009. "Access Mechanisms for Orphan Drugs: A Comparative Study of Selected European Countries," Briefing 000227, Office of Health Economics.

   Cited by:

   1. Hanna, E. & Toumi, M. & Dussart, C. & Borissov, B. & Dabbous, O. & Badora, K. & Auquier, P., 2018. "Funding breakthrough therapies: A systematic review and recommendation," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 217-229.
   2. Nicholas Bagley & Benjamin Berger & Amitabh Chandra & Craig Garthwaite & Ariel D. Stern, 2018. "The Orphan Drug Act at 35: Observations and an Outlook for the Twenty-First Century," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 19, pages 97-137, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
   3. Denis, Alain & Mergaert, Lut & Fostier, Christel & Cleemput, Irina & Simoens, Steven, 2010. "A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(2-3), pages 173-179, October.
   4. Michael Drummond & Adrian Towse, 2014. "Orphan drugs policies: a suitable case for treatment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(4), pages 335-340, May.
   5. Fontrier, Anna-Maria, 2022. "Market access for medicines treating rare diseases: Association between specialised processes for orphan medicines and funding recommendations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
   6. Todd Gammie & Christine Y Lu & Zaheer Ud-Din Babar, 2015. "Access to Orphan Drugs: A Comprehensive Review of Legislations, Regulations and Policies in 35 Countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.

Articles

1. Martina Garau & Grace Hampson & Nancy Devlin & Nicola Amedeo Mazzanti & Antonio Profico, 2018. "Applying a Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Approach to Elicit Stakeholders’ Preferences in Italy: The Case of Obinutuzumab for Rituximab-Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 153-163, June.

   Cited by:

   1. Ahumada-Canale, Antonio & Jeet, Varinder & Bilgrami, Anam & Seil, Elizabeth & Gu, Yuanyuan & Cutler, Henry, 2023. "Barriers and facilitators to implementing priority setting and resource allocation tools in hospital decisions: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).

Books

Sorry, no citations of books recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 6 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.

1. NEP-HEA: Health Economics (4) 2018-05-21 2018-05-21 2019-03-25 2020-06-08
2. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (1) 2018-10-15
3. NEP-INO: Innovation (1) 2018-10-15
4. NEP-MKT: Marketing (1) 2018-05-21
5. NEP-ORE: Operations Research (1) 2020-03-09
6. NEP-TID: Technology and Industrial Dynamics (1) 2018-10-15

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Martina Garau should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.