IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wbk/wbpubs/18864.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Learning from Megadisasters : Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Ranghieri
  • Mikio Ishiwatari

Abstract

The successes of Japan’s disaster risk management (DRM) system as well as the ways in which that system could be improved are reflected in the lessons drawn from the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE) and presented in the initial reports from the Learning from Megadisasters project. The GEJE was the first disaster ever recorded that included an earthquake, a tsunami, a nuclear power plant accident, a power supply failure, and a large-scale disruption of supply chains. Extreme disasters underscore the need for a holistic approach to DRM. Single-sector development planning cannot address the complexity of problems posed by natural hazards, let alone megadisasters, nor can such planning build resilience to threats. Faced with complex risks, Japan chose to build resilience by investing in preventative structural and nonstructural measures; nurturing a strong culture of knowledge and learning from past disasters; engaging in wise DRM regulation, legislation, and enforcement; and promoting cooperation among multiple stakeholders, between government agencies and ministries, between the private sector and the government, and among multiple levels of governance, from local to national to international. The book consolidates a set of 36 Knowledge Notes, research results of a joint study undertaken by the Government of Japan and the World Bank. These notes highlight key lessons learned in seven DRM thematic clusters—structural measures; nonstructural measures; emergency response; reconstruction planning; hazard and risk information and decision making; the economics of disaster risk, risk management, and risk financing; and recovery and relocation. Aimed at sharing Japanese cutting-edge knowledge with practitioners and decision makers, this book provides valuable guidance to other disaster-prone countries for mainstreaming DRM in their development policies and weathering their own natural disasters.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Ranghieri & Mikio Ishiwatari, 2014. "Learning from Megadisasters : Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 18864, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:18864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/18864/9781464801532.pdf?sequence=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bachev, Hrabrin & Ito, Fusao, 2017. "Agricultural impacts of the Great East Japan Earthquake - six years later," MPRA Paper 79469, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ghimire Kanksha Mahadevia, 2018. "Path Dependence, Abnormal Times and Missed Opportunities: Case Studies of Catastrophic Natural Disasters From India and Nepal," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 31-76, January.
    3. Sardar S. Shareef, 2023. "Earthquake Consideration in Architectural Design: Guidelines for Architects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Yang, David Y. & Frangopol, Dan M., 2019. "Life-cycle management of deteriorating civil infrastructure considering resilience to lifetime hazards: A general approach based on renewal-reward processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 197-212.
    5. Federica Ranghieri, 2014. "Learning from megadisasters: lessons learnt from the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 5-17.
    6. Gomez, Oscar A. & Kawaguchi, Chigumi, 2016. "The Continuum of Humanitarian Crises Management: Multiple Approaches and the Challenge of Convergence," Working Papers 136, JICA Research Institute.
    7. Hrabrin BACHEV, 2014. "Socio Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Match 2011 Earthquake Tsunami And Fukushima Nuclear Accident In Japan," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 127-222.
    8. Nicholas Pinter & Mikio Ishiwateri & Atsuko Nonoguchi & Yumiko Tanaka & David Casagrande & Susan Durden & James Rees, 2019. "Large-scale managed retreat and structural protection following the 2011 Japan tsunami," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(3), pages 1429-1436, April.
    9. Xiang Zheng & Chuyao Feng & Mikio Ishiwatari, 2022. "Examining the Indirect Death Surveillance System of The Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. A.Haarscher & M. Bruner & J. Doblas & A. Fargere, 2014. "The Japanese Electricity System 15 months After March 11th 2011," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1443, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2015. "March 2011 earthquake, tsunami and Fukushima nuclear accident impacts on Japanese agri-food sector," MPRA Paper 61499, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Mikio Ishiwatari & Daisuke Sasaki, 2022. "Disaster Risk Reduction Funding: Investment Cycle for Flood Protection in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Takano, Keisuke, 2019. "Does visible shock update firms' unrelated trade diversity in anticipation of future shock? Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake and expected Nankai Trough Earthquake," TDB-CAREE Discussion Paper Series E-2019-01, Teikoku Databank Center for Advanced Empirical Research on Enterprise and Economy, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    14. Josep Pastrana-Huguet & Maria-Francisca Casado-Claro & Elisa Gavari-Starkie, 2022. "Japan’s Culture of Prevention: How Bosai Culture Combines Cultural Heritage with State-of-the-Art Disaster Risk Management Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Md. Mashrur Rahman & Uttama Barua & Farzana Khatun & Ishrat Islam & Rezwana Rafiq, 2018. "Participatory Vulnerability Reduction (PVR): an urban community-based approach for earthquake management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1479-1505, September.
    16. Ajam, Meraj & Akbari, Vahid & Salman, F. Sibel, 2019. "Minimizing latency in post-disaster road clearance operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1098-1112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:18864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tal Ayalon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.