IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/iie/piiebs/piieb16-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Assessing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Volume 2: Innovations in Trading Rules

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey J. Schott

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Cathleen Cimino-Isaacs

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

On February 4, 2016, the United States and 11 other countries signed the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), an ambitious accord that not only lowers barriers to trade and investment in goods and services but also crafts trading rules and standards in important areas such as intellectual property rights (IPR), state-owned enterprises, digital trade, labor, and environment. Now with the agreement signed, the Obama administration and Congress must work together to draft implementing legislation and resolve outstanding issues that may hold up bipartisan support for the deal. TPP compromises related to IPR, labor, and currency are among the most contentious issues. In a series of publications the Peterson Institute for International Economics has undertaken an ambitious assessment of the TPP's key issues and outcomes to provide a useful reader's guide to the trade pact and contribute to a more educated public debate over its ratification by the United States and other member countries. In Volume 1, PIIE scholars analyzed several major market access and sectoral issues in the TPP. In Volume 2, they assess various innovations in trading rules and how TPP provisions build on past practice. TPP rulemaking in new areas could have important implications for future regional deals and the global trading system writ large.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey J. Schott & Cathleen Cimino-Isaacs, . "Assessing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Volume 2: Innovations in Trading Rules," PIIE Briefings, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number PIIEB16-4, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:iie:piiebs:piieb16-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/piie-briefings/assessing-trans-pacific-partnership-volume-2-innovations-trading-rules
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Fred Bergsten & Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Sean Miner & Tyler Moran, 2014. "Bridging the Pacific: Toward Free Trade and Investment between China and the United States," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 6918, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Ravenhill, 2017. "The political economy of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: a ‘21st Century’ trade agreement?," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 573-594, September.
    2. Artecona, Raquel & Plank-Brumback, Rosine M., 2016. "Access to medicines and incentives for innovation: The balance struck in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) on intellectual property (patent and data exclusivity) protection for pharmaceutical produc," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Office in Washington 40729, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Matthias Helble, 2017. "Salvaging the Trans-Pacific Partnership: building blocks for regional and multilateral trade opening?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 399-416, December.
    4. Berger, Axel & Bruhn, Dominique & Bender, Andrea & Friesen, Julia & Kick, Katharina & Kullmann, Felix & Roßner, Robert & Weyrauch, Svenja, 2016. "Deep preferential trade agreements and upgrading in global value chains: the case of Vietnam," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 92, number 92.
    5. Jovanović, Miroslav, 2016. "Emerging Mega International Blocs: Limits and Prospects," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 69(4), pages 271-316.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan Rutkowski, 2015. "Service Sector Reform in China," Policy Briefs PB15-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    2. William R. Cline, 2014. "Estimates of Fundamental Equilibrium Exchange Rates, November 2014," Policy Briefs PB14-25, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    3. Theodore H. Moran, 2015. "Chinese Investment and CFIUS: Time for an Updated (and Revised) Perspective," Policy Briefs PB15-17, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    4. C. Fred Bergsten, 2014. "Addressing Currency Manipulation Through Trade Agreements," Policy Briefs PB14-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    5. Jeffrey J. Schott & Cathleen Cimino, 2014. "Should Korea Join the Trans-Pacific Partnership?," Policy Briefs PB14-22, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    6. Bala Ramasamy & Matthew C.H. Yeung, 2016. "China and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Misfit or Missed Opportunity?," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 73-88.
    7. Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer, 2020. "Should China Join the New Trans‐Pacific Partnership?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(2), pages 18-36, March.
    8. Robert Z. Lawrence & Tyler Moran, 2016. "Adjustment and Income Distribution Impacts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership," Working Paper Series WP16-5, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    9. Metivier, Jeanne & Di Salvo, Mattia & Pelkmans, Jacques, 2017. "Transatlantic Divergences in Globalisation and the China Factor," CEPS Papers 12584, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    10. Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer, 2016. "The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates," Working Paper Series WP16-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    11. Jeffrey J. Schott & Euijin Jung & Cathleen Cimino, 2015. "An Assessment of the Korea-China Free Trade Agreement," Policy Briefs PB15-24, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    12. C. Fred Bergsten, 2018. "China and the United States: The Contest for Global Economic Leadership," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 26(5), pages 12-37, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:piiebs:piieb16-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.