IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ces/ifofob/22.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Study on the Justification of Major Inhabitant-weighting and the Subsidiary Pupil-weighting Schemes Applied for the Determination of Unconditional Grants in the Saxon Municipal Fiscal Equalisation System

Author

Listed:
  • Rüdiger Parsche
  • Chang Woon Nam
  • Thomas Hanfstingl
  • Korbinian Leitner

Abstract

Die Studie des ifo Instituts München befasst sich mit der Sachgerechtheit des Schlüsselzuweisungssystems im Rahmen des Sächsischen Kommunalen Finanzausgleichs. Der Fokus liegt bei dieser Studie insbesondere auf den wesentlichen Verteilungsmaßstäben des kommunalen Finanzausgleichs in Sachsen, den Hauptansatzstaffeln und dem Schülernebenansatz. Sowohl die Überprüfung der Hauptansatzstaffel der kreisangehörigen Gemeinden, die in sieben Größenklassen eingeteilt sind, als auch der Hauptansatzstaffel der sieben kreisfreien Städte lassen einen Reformbedarf erkennen. Auch aus den Berechnungen der aktuellen Zuschussbedarfsrelation zum Schülernebenansatz ergibt sich Reformbedarf. Auf Grund der Neujustierungen der Hauptansatzstaffeln, der Schülergewichte und der Vervielfältiger wird es zwar gegenüber dem Status quo zu gewissen Verwerfungen bei den Zuweisungen an die einzelnen Kommunen kommen, eine veränderte Bedarfssituation macht dies allerdings auch notwendig.

Suggested Citation

  • Rüdiger Parsche & Chang Woon Nam & Thomas Hanfstingl & Korbinian Leitner, 2004. "Study on the Justification of Major Inhabitant-weighting and the Subsidiary Pupil-weighting Schemes Applied for the Determination of Unconditional Grants in the Saxon Municipal Fiscal Equalisation Sys," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 22.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifo_Forschungsberichte_22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Schaden & Ulrike Mandalka & Rüdiger Parsche & Carsten Schreiber, 1995. "Entwicklung und Lage der Kommunalfinanzen im Freistaat Sachsen," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 7.
    2. Rüdiger Parsche & Christian Baretti & Robert Fenge & Steffen Jahn & Erich Langmantel & Chang Woon Nam & Bettina Reichl & Matthias Steinherr & Thorsten Uehlein & Frank Zander, 2001. "Analyses and Further Development of Measuring Municipal Expenditure Needs in Saarland," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 7, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Eck & Joachim Ragnitz & Johannes Steinbrecher & Christian Thater, 2012. "The future appropriateness of the revenue sharing between different groups of municipalities in Saxony," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 67.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Baretti, 2002. "Are states being punished for their successful efforts in attracting business? The incentives of the municipal finance system," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(07), pages 10-16, April.
    2. Rüdiger Parsche & Chang Woon Nam & Ingo Wagner & Frank Zander, 2002. "The Municipal Fiscal Equalisation System in Saxony," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 10, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.