IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/znw/papers/zfn-2009-1-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incentives in statutory health insurance bonus schemes - Communication as an underrated precondition of success

Author

Listed:
  • Viviane Scherenberg

    (ABS Computer GmbH – Fachagentur für edv-gestützes Marketing)

  • Gerd Glaeske

Abstract

Aim - Bonus schemes within German statutory health insurance (GKV) use monetary incentives to promote health-conscious behaviour, particularly amongst risk groups. The idea is to exploit a latent potential for participation in money-saving preventive measures. First studies suggest that incidental effects (good risks) are more common than prevention effects. The purpose of the article is to present factors contributing to the successfulness of incentive schemes. Methods - To outline the findings of current research, an analysis of the literature was carried out. By law, sickness funds in Germany have to report on savings made. This kind of report portrays cost-efficiency but does not provide an assessment of general learning with regard to optimal practice. The analysis therefore also included studies from commercial areas in order to identify possible success factors and research needs. Results - The results of the literature analysis show that not only do the core elements of bonus schemes play a significant role, but additional elements (reminder systems, removing barriers) also help to increase the participation rate in prevention measures. Conclusion - In order to stimulate health-conscious behaviour, more attention should in future be paid to the removal of barriers to information, knowledge, and empowerment.

Suggested Citation

  • Viviane Scherenberg & Gerd Glaeske, 2009. "Incentives in statutory health insurance bonus schemes - Communication as an underrated precondition of success," Zeitschrift für Nachwuchswissenschaftler - German Journal for Young Researchers, Zeitschrift für Nachwuchswissenschaftler - German Journal for Young Researchers, vol. 1(1), pages 45-61, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:znw:papers:zfn-2009-1-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nachwuchswissenschaftler.org/2009/1/69/ZfN-2009-1-69.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.nachwuchswissenschaftler.org/2009/1/69/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bonus programme; Health insurance funds; Communication; Prevention; Incentives; Motivation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:znw:papers:zfn-2009-1-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wilfried Honekamp (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nachwuchswissenschaftler.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.