IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbnees/v3y2019i2p26-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Heavy Metal Uptake And Phytoremediation Potential Of Three Jatropha Species

Author

Listed:
  • Olamilekan L. Awotedu

    (Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Jericho, Ibadan, Oyo State. Nigeria)

  • Paul O. Ogunbamowo

    (Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Jericho, Ibadan, Oyo State. Nigeria)

Abstract

The comparative metal uptake and phytoremediation capacity of Jatropha curcas, Jatropha gossypifolia, and Jatropha multifida in heavy metal contaminated soil from a dumpsite in Ibadan Nigeria were studied. Plants were transplanted into polythene pots containing 2kg of soil (control and dumpsite), using a 3×2 factorial laid out in complete randomized designed. Cu, Zn, Cr, Cd, Pb and Ni concentration was determined in the soil before planting and after harvesting as well as in the roots and shoots of the plant after 12 weeks using the standard method. The heavy metal levels in the control soil are within the permissible limits of WHO/FAO while only Cr and Ni in the contaminated soils are within the limit. The heavy metals concentration in the root of the plants ranged from 0.27-63.14 mg/kg (Cu), 4.82-54.18 mg/kg (Zn), 0.48-3.47 mg/kg (Cr), 1.75-72.37 mg/kg (Pb) and 0.05-3.23 mg/kg (Ni); in the shoots, the concentration ranged from 0.25-33.36 mg/kg (Cu), 5.40-12.48 mg/kg (Zn), 0.29-1.45 mg/kg (Cr), 0.58-8.26 mg/kg (Pb) and 0.05-3.23 mg/kg (Ni). Cd was not detected in the root and shoot of the three Jatropha species. Analysis of variance shows heavy metal uptake was influenced by the interaction of contamination level and Jatropha species. Bioaccumulation factor and Translocation factor ranged from 0.07-0.16 and 0.53-0.6 (Cu);

Suggested Citation

  • Olamilekan L. Awotedu & Paul O. Ogunbamowo, 2019. "Comparative Heavy Metal Uptake And Phytoremediation Potential Of Three Jatropha Species," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 26-30, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbnees:v:3:y:2019:i:2:p:26-30
    DOI: 10.26480/ees.02.2019.26.30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://environecosystem.com/download/14274/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/ees.02.2019.26.30?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbnees:v:3:y:2019:i:2:p:26-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://environecosystem.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.