IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbesmy/v6y2022i1p01-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Of Static Shear Modulus And Dynamic Shear Modulus Determined By Geophysical And Geotechnical Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Udota S. Benjamin

    (Department of Physics, Rivers State University, Nkpolu-Oroworukwo, PMB 5080, Port Harcourt, Nigeria)

  • Tamunobereton-ari I.

    (Department of Physics, Rivers State University, Nkpolu-Oroworukwo, PMB 5080, Port Harcourt, Nigeria)

  • Horsfall I. Opiriyabo

    (Department of Physics, Rivers State University, Nkpolu-Oroworukwo, PMB 5080, Port Harcourt, Nigeria)

  • Mogaba P

    (DeGeoid Limited)

Abstract

Due to the occurrence of earth tremors which leads to the vibrations of foundations and perhaps failure of buildings and roads, it is therefore important to understand and have knowledge of the geomechanical soil properties for foundation design, assessment of risks and suggestion of mitigation plans in engineering structures and road construction. A total of 3 boreholes were drilled with the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) performed and Downhole Seismic Test (DST) carried out in the boreholes located within Assa to investigate the Geomechanical soil properties in the area. For the geophysical survey, the downhole seismic test was carried out to determine the P-wave and S-wave. The results were processed using the generalized reciprocal method (GRM) with the Seisimager program. The results of soil dynamic modulus (shear, young and bulk modulus) and Poisson ratio recorded from DST conducted in BH1, BH2 and BH3 ranges from 7300 KPa to 72390 KPa, 0.31 to 0.41 for the Poisson ratio. Meanwhile, soil static modulus and Poisson’s ratio recorded from SPT conducted in BH1, BH2 and BH3 ranges from 2520 to 44687.0 KPa, 0.20 to 0.55 for the Poisson ratio respectively. The results of this study have shown that there is a wide variation between geomechanical properties derived from geotechnical investigations (static properties) and geophysical investigations (dynamic properties). Based on depth trend analysis, the dynamic and static soil elastic properties all increases with depth. Generally, the dynamic soil properties were significantly higher than the static elastic properties. At shallow depths (

Suggested Citation

  • Udota S. Benjamin & Tamunobereton-ari I. & Horsfall I. Opiriyabo & Mogaba P, 2022. "Comparative Analysis Of Static Shear Modulus And Dynamic Shear Modulus Determined By Geophysical And Geotechnical Investigation," Earth Sciences Malaysia (ESMY), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 01-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbesmy:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:01-10
    DOI: 10.26480/esmy.01.2022.10.10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://earthsciencesmalaysia.com/archives/ESMY/1esmy2022/1esmy2022-01-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/esmy.01.2022.10.10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Shear Modulus; SPT; DST; Bulk modulus;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbesmy:v:6:y:2022:i:1:p:01-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://earthsciencesmalaysia.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.