IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/278800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A platform policy implementation audit of actions against Russia's state-controlled media

Author

Listed:
  • Glazunova, Sofya
  • Ryzhova, Anna
  • Bruns, Axel
  • Montaña-Niño, Silvia Ximena
  • Beseler, Arista
  • Dehghan, Ehsan

Abstract

The information influence of Russia's state-controlled media outlets such as RT and Sputnik on global multimillion audiences has been one of the major concerns for Western democracies and Ukraine in the last decade. With the start of the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia, they were recognised as a threat to international security and several major bans were implemented towards RT and Sputnik, including their ban in the EU and its member states, and non-EU countries such as Canada, the UK and Australia, and reinforced content moderation by digital platforms globally. Digital platforms had to step up as new arbitrators of digital public spheres in this crisis event, which led us to question how major digital platforms (Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Telegram) have implemented their content moderation policies towards RT and Sputnik accounts following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, across ten countries. We present a platform policy implementation audit method to analyse such content moderation measures, and demonstrate its implementation by six coders after two months of the full-scale invasion. Our audit shows largely inconsistent trends in platform policy implementation towards RT and Sputnik, as well as a wide catalogue of measures taken by tech giants. We conclude with a discussion of the further implications and effectiveness of such content moderation measures for global digital audiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Glazunova, Sofya & Ryzhova, Anna & Bruns, Axel & Montaña-Niño, Silvia Ximena & Beseler, Arista & Dehghan, Ehsan, 2023. "A platform policy implementation audit of actions against Russia's state-controlled media," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:278800
    DOI: 10.14763/2023.2.1711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/278800/1/1862631727.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2023.2.1711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:278800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.