IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/278798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial intelligence regulation in the United Kingdom: A path to good governance and global leadership?

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts, Huw
  • Babuta, Alexander
  • Morley, Jessica
  • Thomas, Christopher
  • Taddeo, Mariarosaria
  • Floridi, Luciano

Abstract

On 29 March 2023 the United Kingdom (UK) government published its AI Regulation White Paper, a "proportionate and pro-innovation regulatory framework" for AI designed to support innovation, identify and address risks, and establish the UK as an "AI superpower". In this article, we assess whether the approach outlined in this policy document is appropriate for meeting the country's stated ambitions. We argue that the proposed continuation of a sector-led approach, which relies on existing regulators addressing risks that fall within their remits, could support contextually appropriate and novel AI governance initiatives. However, a growing emphasis from the central government on promoting innovation through weakening checks, combined with domestic tensions between Westminster and the UK's devolved nations, will undermine the effectiveness and ethical permissibility of UK AI governance initiatives. At the same time, the likelihood of the UK's initiatives proving successful is contingent on relationships with, and decisions from, other jurisdictions, particularly the European Union. If left unaddressed in subsequent policy, these factors risk transforming the UK into a reluctant follower, rather than a global leader, in AI governance. We conclude this paper by outlining a set of recommendations for UK policymakers to mitigate the domestic and international risks associated with the country's current trajectory.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts, Huw & Babuta, Alexander & Morley, Jessica & Thomas, Christopher & Taddeo, Mariarosaria & Floridi, Luciano, 2023. "Artificial intelligence regulation in the United Kingdom: A path to good governance and global leadership?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 12(2), pages 1-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:278798
    DOI: 10.14763/2023.2.1709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/278798/1/1862630933.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2023.2.1709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:278798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.