IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/indbez/240317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Konzertierte Verunsicherung angesichts Industrie 4.0 - Herausforderungen für die betriebliche Sozialpartnerschaft
[Concerted uncertainty in the face of industry 4.0 - challenges for codetermination and industrial relations]

Author

Listed:
  • Matuschek, Ingo
  • Kleemann, Frank

Abstract

Die Einführung von Industrie-4.0-Anwendungen ist aufgrund ihrer (potenziellen) Reichweite für die betrieblichen Akteurinnen und Akteure von grundlegenden Unsicherheiten in technischer, arbeitsorganisatorischer und beschäftigungspolitischer Hinsicht gekennzeichnet. Der Beitrag exploriert auf der Grundlage empirischer Fallstudien zur Einführung von digitaler Produktionstechnik in Industriebetrieben die dortigen Handlungs- und Entscheidungsbedingungen. Im Zentrum steht die Frage, wie nach Betriebsverfassungsgesetz mitbestimmungspflichtige Implementierungen von Industrie-4.0- Komponenten prozessiert werden und wie betriebliche Mitbestimmung in diesem Kontext praktiziert wird. Fokussiert werden insbesondere die betriebsinterne Relation von Management und Betriebsräten und die Handlungsmöglichkeiten der betrieblichen Interessenvertretung hinsichtlich konkreter, bereits vollzogener oder aber noch laufender Einführungsprozesse der Industrie 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Matuschek, Ingo & Kleemann, Frank, 2019. "Konzertierte Verunsicherung angesichts Industrie 4.0 - Herausforderungen für die betriebliche Sozialpartnerschaft [Concerted uncertainty in the face of industry 4.0 - challenges for codeterminatio," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 26(2), pages 189-206.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:240317
    DOI: 10.3224/indbez.v26i2.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/240317/1/indbez-v26i2-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3224/indbez.v26i2.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hervé Laroche, 1995. "From Decision to Action in Organizations: Decision-Making as a Social Representation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 62-75, February.
    2. Matuschek, Ingo & Kleemann, Frank, 2018. "„Was man nicht kennt, kann man nicht regeln“ Betriebsvereinbarungen als Instrument der arbeitspolitischen Regulierung von Industrie 4.0 und Digitalisierung," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 71(3), pages 227-234.
    3. Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut, 2014. "Wandel von Produktionsarbeit – „Industrie 4.0“," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 67(6), pages 421-429.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krzywdzinski, Martin & Gerst, Detlef & Butollo, Florian, 2022. "Promoting human-centred AI in the workplace. Trade unions and their strategies for regulating the use of AI in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-1.
    2. Coget, Jean-Francois & Haag, Christophe & Gibson, Donald E., 2011. "Anger and fear in decision-making: The case of film directors on set," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 476-490.
    3. Krzywdzinski, Martin & Pfeiffer, Sabine & Evers, Maren & Gerber, Christine, 2022. "Measuring work and workers: Wearables and digital assistance systems in manufacturing and logistics," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2022-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Kinkel, Steffen & Lichtner, Ralph, 2018. "Globalisierungs- und Verlagerungstendenzen bei F&E-Tätigkeiten: Trendanalyse," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 084, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    5. Michele Franco & Cida Sanches, 2016. "Influence of Emotions on Decision-Making," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(1), pages 40-62, January.
    6. Laure Cabantous & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2011. "Rational Decision Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality's Éternel Retour," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 573-586, June.
    7. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    8. Patriotta, Gerardo & Spedale, Simona, 2011. "Micro-interaction dynamics in group decision making: Face games, interaction order and boundary work," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 362-374.
    9. Florence Allard-Poesi, 1998. "Representations And Influence Processes In Groups: Towards A Socio-Cognitive Perspective On Cognition In Organization," Post-Print hal-01490579, HAL.
    10. Christelle Bruyere & Nathalie Fabbe-Costes, 2011. "Le pilotage des chaînes multi-acteurs temporaires: une analyse des processus décisionnels," Post-Print hal-03312944, HAL.
    11. Roth, Ines, 2018. "Digitalisierung in der Energiewirtschaft: Technologische Trends und ihre Auswirkungen auf Arbeit und Qualifizierung," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 073, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    12. Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen, 2016. "Digitization of industrial work: development paths and prospects [Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit: Entwicklungspfade und Perspektiven]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 49(1), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Kirsten Martin & Bidhan Parmar, 2012. "Assumptions in Decision Making Scholarship: Implications for Business Ethics Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 289-306, February.
    14. Muhammad Nadeem Shahzad & Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi & Waqar Ali, 2020. "Relationship of Principals Academic Decision-Making Practices with Faculty Morale: A Study of Colleges in Punjab," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 5(1), pages 376-385, March.
    15. Keller, Berndt, 2020. "Interest representation and industrial relations in the age of digitalization ‒ an outline [Interessenvertretung und Arbeitsbeziehungen im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung - ein Überblick]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(3), pages 255-285.
    16. Serdukov, Svetlana, 2012. "From the chaos of transition economy to “normalized” managerial practices: The role of group interaction in creating meaning in managerial work," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 17(4), pages 423-444.
    17. Brendel, Sarah & Simon, Hendrik & Brinkmann, Ulrich & Paulitz, Tanja, 2020. "Digitalisierungswissen im Großunternehmen. Machtressource einer betrieblichen digitalen Bohème," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 181, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    18. Martin Krzywdzinski & Detlef Gerst & Florian Butollo, 2023. "Promoting human-centred AI in the workplace. Trade unions and their strategies for regulating the use of AI in Germany," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(1), pages 53-70, February.
    19. Herrmann, Jens, 2020. "Betriebliche Mitbestimmungspraxis bei Digitalisierungsprozessen in der stationären Altenpflege," Forschung Aktuell 02/2020, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    20. Sander Merkus & Marcel Veenswijk, 2017. "Turning New Public Management theory into reality: Performative struggle during a large scale planning process," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(7), pages 1264-1284, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrie 4.0; Digitalisierung; Industrielle Beziehungen; betriebliche Mitbestimmung; industry 4.0; digitization; industrial relations; co-determination;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:240317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/indbez/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.