IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/264381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frontier metrics for a process-based understanding of deforestation dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Baumann, Matthias
  • Gasparri, Ignacio
  • Buchadas, Ana
  • Oeser, Julian
  • Meyfroidt, Patrick
  • Levers, Christian
  • Romero-Muñoz, Alfredo
  • le Polain de Waroux, Yann
  • Müller, Daniel
  • Kuemmerle, Tobias

Abstract

Agricultural expansion into tropical and subtropical forests often leads to major social-ecological trade-offs. Yet, despite ever-more detailed information on where deforestation occurs, how agriculture expands into forests remains unclear, which is hampered by a lack of spatially and temporally detailed reconstruction of agricultural expansion. Here, we developed and mapped a novel set of metrics that quantify agricultural frontier processes at unprecedented spatial and temporal detail. Specifically, we first derived consistent annual time series of land-use/cover to, second, describe archetypical patterns of frontier expansion, pertaining to the speed, the diffusion and activity of deforestation, as well as post-deforestation land use. We exemplify this approach for understanding agricultural frontier expansion across the entire South American Chaco (1.1 million km 2 ), a global deforestation hotspot. Our study provides three major insights. First, agricultural expansion has been rampant in the Chaco, with more than 19.3 million ha of woodlands converted between 1985 and 2020, including a surge in deforestation after 2019. Second, land-use trajectories connected to frontier processes have changed in major ways over the 35 year study period we studied, including substantial regional variations. For instance, while ranching expansion drove most of the deforestation in the 1980s and 1990s, cropland expansion dominated during the mid-2000s in Argentina, but not in Paraguay. Similarly, 40% of all areas deforested were initially used for ranching, but later on converted to cropping. Accounting for post-deforestation land-use change is thus needed to properly attribute deforestation and associated environmental impacts, such as carbon emissions or biodiversity loss, to commodities. Finally, we identified major, recurrent frontier types that may be a useful spatial template for land governance to match policies to specific frontier situations. Collectively, our study reveals the diversity of frontier processes and how frontier metrics can capture and structure this diversity to uncover major patterns of human–nature interactions, which can be used to guide spatially-targeted policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Baumann, Matthias & Gasparri, Ignacio & Buchadas, Ana & Oeser, Julian & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Levers, Christian & Romero-Muñoz, Alfredo & le Polain de Waroux, Yann & Müller, Daniel & Kuemmerle, Tobias, 2022. "Frontier metrics for a process-based understanding of deforestation dynamics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(9).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:264381
    DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8b9a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/264381/1/Baumann_2022_understanding_deforestation_dynamics.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1088/1748-9326/ac8b9a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mosciaro, María Jesús & Seghezzo, Lucas & Texeira, Marcos & Paruelo, José & Volante, José, 2023. "Where did the forest go? Post-deforestation land use dynamics in the Dry Chaco region in Northwestern Argentina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:264381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.