IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/201387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Kuratierung sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschungsdaten - Praxisfragen und Beispiellösungen

Author

Listed:
  • Droß, Patrick J.
  • Naujoks, Julian

Abstract

Der Beitrag bietet einen Blick in die Praxis der Veröffentlichung sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschungsdaten. Dabei beschreibt er den Arbeitsschritt der Datenkuratierung als wesentliche Komponente, um Forschungsdaten nachhaltig verfügbar zu machen. Anhand der Erfahrungen des institutionellen Forschungsdatenmanagements am Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) werden einzelne Problemfelder und Praxislösungen dargestellt, die im Laufe des Kuratierungsprozesses auftreten. Dabei sich zeigt, dass die Datenkuratierung ein komplexer Vorgang ist, bei dem sich fachspezifische, aber auch (arbeits-)organisatorische Herausforderungen stellen. Diese werden anhand von drei exemplarischen Themenkomplexen skizziert: Datenschutzfragen müssen im Forschungsprozess frühzeitig mitgedacht werden. Dazu gehört, dass in informierten Einwilligungen die Rechte der Befragten geschützt, gleichzeitig aber spätere Nachnutzungsmöglichkeiten nicht durch zu restriktive Formulierungen ausgeschlossen werden. In Bezug auf die Verwertungs- und Nutzungsrechte muss gerade in Projektkonstellationen mit mehreren Beteiligten frühzeitig eine Abstimmung über die Datenveröffentlichung erfolgen. Schließlich verdeutlicht die Verknüpfung von Daten- und Textpublikation, wie sich Veröffentlichungsroutinen und Suchgewohnheiten der Wissenschaftler*innen auf die Auffindbarkeit der Forschungsdaten auswirken.

Suggested Citation

  • Droß, Patrick J. & Naujoks, Julian, 2019. "Die Kuratierung sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschungsdaten - Praxisfragen und Beispiellösungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 23-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:201387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/201387/1/f-22196-Volltext-Dross-et_al-Kuratierung-v3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabella Peters & Peter Kraker & Elisabeth Lex & Christian Gumpenberger & Juan Gorraiz, 2016. "Research data explored: an extended analysis of citations and altmetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 723-744, May.
    2. Droß, Patrick J. & Fräßdorf, Mathis & Kubaty, Paul & Naujoks, Julian, 2017. "Open Data in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften: das Forschungsdatenrepositorium SowiDataNet," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 31-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fecher, Benedikt & Fräßdorf, Mathis & Wagner, Gert G., 2016. "Perceptions and Practices of Replication by Social and Behavioral Scientists: Making Replications a Mandatory Element of Curricula Would Be Useful," IZA Discussion Papers 9896, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Daniel Torres-Salinas & Nicolás Robinson-Garcia & Juan Gorraiz, 2017. "Filling the citation gap: measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(3), pages 1371-1384, December.
    3. Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent & Antonio Vidal-Infer & Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo & Fernanda Peset & Antonia Ferrer Sapena, 2020. "Research Data Sharing in Spain: Exploring Determinants, Practices, and Perceptions," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Kai Li & Jason Rollins & Erjia Yan, 2018. "Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Xia Nan & Ming Li & Jin Shi, 2020. "Using altmetrics for assessing impact of highly-cited books in Chinese Book Citation Index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1651-1669, March.
    6. Barbara McGillivray & Paola Marongiu & Nilo Pedrazzini & Marton Ribary & Mandy Wigdorowitz & Eleonora Zordan, 2022. "Deep Impact: A Study on the Impact of Data Papers and Datasets in the Humanities and Social Sciences," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-40, October.
    7. Dosso, Dennis & Silvello, Gianmaria, 2020. "Data credit distribution: A new method to estimate databases impact," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    8. Mike Thelwall & Marcus Munafò & Amalia Mas-Bleda & Emma Stuart & Meiko Makita & Verena Weigert & Chris Keene & Nushrat Khan & Katie Drax & Kayvan Kousha, 2020. "Is useful research data usually shared? An investigation of genome-wide association study summary statistics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, February.
    9. Rongying Zhao & Mingkun Wei, 2017. "Impact evaluation of open source software: an Altmetrics perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 1017-1033, February.
    10. Thomy Tonia & Herman Van Oyen & Anke Berger & Christian Schindler & Nino Künzli, 2020. "If I tweet will you cite later? Follow-up on the effect of social media exposure on article downloads and citations," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(9), pages 1797-1802, December.
    11. Xie, Qing & Wang, Jiamin & Kim, Giyeong & Lee, Soobin & Song, Min, 2021. "A sensitivity analysis of factors influential to the popularity of shared data in data repositories," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    12. Nushrat Khan & Mike Thelwall & Kayvan Kousha, 2021. "Measuring the impact of biodiversity datasets: data reuse, citations and altmetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3621-3639, April.
    13. Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas & Mongeon, Philippe & Jeng, Wei & Costas, Rodrigo, 2017. "DataCite as a novel bibliometric source: Coverage, strengths and limitations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 841-854.
    14. José Luis Ortega, 2020. "Blogs and news sources coverage in altmetrics data providers: a comparative analysis by country, language, and subject," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 555-572, January.
    15. Hyoungjoo Park & Dietmar Wolfram, 2017. "An examination of research data sharing and re-use: implications for data citation practice," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 443-461, April.
    16. José Luis Ortega, 2018. "Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event Data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 2123-2138, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:201387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.