IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ysm/ypfsfc/v4y2022i2p257-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Belgium: Protection Fund/Special Protection Fund

Author

Abstract

At the height of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in fall 2008, the Belgian government increased the coverage limits of its deposit guarantee to restore faith in its banking system, protect savers and depositors, and safeguard financial stability. Belgium joined the European Union's (EU) efforts to strengthen deposit guarantee systems. The measures complemented the Belgian government's other efforts to secure domestic banks. The government implemented the emergency measures in October and November 2008 through royal decrees, which Parliament later incorporated into law. In a five-week span, Belgian authorities increased the deposit guarantee from EUR 20,000 to EUR 100,000 (USD 26,820 to USD 134,100). They also expanded coverage to include deposit-like life insurance products. Two public institutions administered the guarantees for credit institutions and investment firms: the existing Protection Fund for Deposits and Financial Instruments (FDP) guaranteed deposit balances up to EUR 50,000, and the newly created Special Protection Fund for Deposits and Life Insurance (SPF) guaranteed balances between EUR 50,000 and EUR 100,000. Separately, the SPF guaranteed "class 21" life insurance products up to EUR 100,000. The FDP and SPF collected contributions from members. The FDP could also use assets collected by legacy insurance funds prior to the FDP's establishment in 1998. FDP and SPF protection was compulsory for both credit institutions and investment firms. SPF protection was originally voluntary for life insurers and later became compulsory; life insurers were not members of the FDP. Annually, FDP and SPF members contributed a proportion of their income and assets eligible for protection to the funds. Fees were initially uniform and later became risk based. Protected assets included a range of deposit accounts, financial instruments, and "class 21" life insurance products that offered a fixed return. In 2010, authorities lowered payment timelines from three months to 20 working days, in line with EU guidance. The government initially set a timeline of one year for the higher deposit guarantee limits but later made them permanent. The FDP held collective assets of more than EUR 800 million by year-end 2008. Both the FDP and SPF went unused from 2008 through 2011. External evaluations about the intervention are positive, with scholars arguing that it helped to restore stability to the Belgian banking system during the GFC.

Suggested Citation

  • Kulam, Adam, 2022. "Belgium: Protection Fund/Special Protection Fund," Journal of Financial Crises, Yale Program on Financial Stability (YPFS), vol. 4(2), pages 257-279, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ysm:ypfsfc:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:257-279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1296&context=journal-of-financial-crises
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    account guarantee; deposit guarantee; Fonds de Protection des Depots et des Instruments Financiers; Fonds Special de Protection des Depots et des Assurances sur la Vie;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ysm:ypfsfc:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:257-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/smyalus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.