IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/rpbfmp/v12y2009i01ns0219091509001563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Unsolicited Credit Ratings in Japan: New Evidence from Moody's

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa M. Fairchild

    (Department of Finance, The Sellinger School of Business & Management, Loyola College in Maryland, 4501 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21210, USA)

  • Susan M. V. Flaherty

    (Department of Finance, Towson University, 8000 York Road, Stephens Hall, Room 316E, Towson, MD 21252, USA)

  • Yoon S. Shin

    (Department of Finance, The Sellinger School of Business & Management, Loyola College in Maryland, 4501 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21210, USA)

Abstract

Previous studies show that the unsolicited ratings of S&P and Fitch are lower than the solicited ratings assigned by these two agencies. The unsolicited ratings of S&P and Fitch are based on publicly available information for a firm. However, no previous study has examined the unsolicited ratings of Moody's because Moody's does not disclose whether its ratings are solicited or unsolicited. Using Moody's solicited and unsolicited ratings collected from a survey of Japanese firms, we find that unsolicited credit ratings are still lower than solicited ratings even though firms with unsolicited ratings provide Moody's with some degree of inside information. We also compare the unsolicited ratings of S&P with those of Moody's and find that Moody's ratings are no different than those assigned by S&P although S&P's unsolicited ratings are based on public information. Therefore, we conclude that, regardless of the rating agency, unsolicited ratings are lower than solicited ratings because firms with unsolicited ratings provide incomplete private information to rating agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa M. Fairchild & Susan M. V. Flaherty & Yoon S. Shin, 2009. "Analysis of Unsolicited Credit Ratings in Japan: New Evidence from Moody's," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(01), pages 103-123.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:12:y:2009:i:01:n:s0219091509001563
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219091509001563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219091509001563
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219091509001563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Yu-Li & Shen, Chung-Hua, 2019. "What role does the investor-paid rating agency play in China? Competitor or information provider," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 253-272.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Credit rating agencies; unsolicited ratings; Moody's; JEL Classification: G10; JEL Classification: G20;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:12:y:2009:i:01:n:s0219091509001563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/rpbfmp/rpbfmp.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.