IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jeapmx/v07y2005i01ns146433320500192x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eia Screening In Denmark: A New Regulatory Instrument?

Author

Listed:
  • ESKILD HOLM NIELSEN

    (Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Fibigerstrade 13, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • PER CHRISTENSEN

    (Environmental Assessment Group, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Fibigerstraede 13, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • LONE KØRNØV

    (Environmental Assessment Group, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Fibigerstraede 13, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is the process by which the effects that proposed projects are likely to have are assessed with respect to a number of environmental criteria. Screening is an activity carried out in advance of an EIA to determine whether, in fact, it is necessary to undertake a full assessment. In that sense screening has become not only an administrative filtering procedure but also effectively a kind of regulation.Since the implementation of the Directive in 1999, counties (county councils) in Denmark have screened around 2000 projects annually. Approximately 3 percent of the decisions arising from screening lead to a "full EIA".This article is based on a study of 98 documented screening decisions combined with interviews with developers and their consultants as well as county officials for each project. Herein, we analyse both the number of modifications to projects made due to the screening process and also how radical or significant the modifications were.EIA regulation meant that approximately 45 percent of the projects were modified. Around half of these modifications were actually made before the administrative process even started. The mere fact that screening exists functions as an eye-opener to developers and consultants. In general, the nature of changes made before and after submission of the application was similar. They covered basically minor changes.Examining the assessments made during screening more closely, we conclude that there is still far to go in order to make the assessment broader and more holistic in accordance with the ambitions set out in the EIA Directive. Among other things, this goes for the assessment of cumulative and potential impacts.On the basis of the evaluation, we also conclude that screening is effectively a regulatory instrument in its own right. Moreover, it seems to be a cost-effective instrument in the sense that, without incurring much administrative expense, it potentially results in environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Eskild Holm Nielsen & Per Christensen & Lone Kørnøv, 2005. "Eia Screening In Denmark: A New Regulatory Instrument?," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 35-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:07:y:2005:i:01:n:s146433320500192x
    DOI: 10.1142/S146433320500192X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S146433320500192X
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S146433320500192X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:07:y:2005:i:01:n:s146433320500192x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jeapm/jeapm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.