IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v03y1999i02ns1363919699000074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Diffusion And Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • D. H. DRURY

    (Faculty of Management, McGill University, 1001 Sherbrooke St. West Montreal, Quebec, Canada)

  • A. FARHOOMAND

    (Faculty of Business, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Economic progress continues to be greatly influenced by the development and adoption of innovations. Maintaining momentum necessitates understanding factors that influence the choices made by organisations. Diffusion and implementation research have each sought to understand necessary conditions and motivations and to identify obstacles. Whether these two areas of research have the same determinants, overlap, or are separate is controversially affecting the interpretation of current research. This issue is the subject of this paper.The empirical investigation compares variables of the diffusion chronology with the choice decision in implementation. This macro-level analysis reveals that the two areas are connected but there are also substantial differences. The results of this study reconfirm the emerging evidence in the literature that the innovation adoption decision should not be treated as a dichotomous organisational choice. Furthermore, the evidence strongly points to the need to develop integrative theories that include the chronological aspects of the innovation adoption process.

Suggested Citation

  • D. H. Drury & A. Farhoomand, 1999. "Innovation Diffusion And Implementation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 133-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:03:y:1999:i:02:n:s1363919699000074
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919699000074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919699000074
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919699000074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ioan Lala Popa & Gheorghe Preda & Monica Boldea, "undated". "Theoretical Approach Of The Concept Of Innovation," Description: Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society 29, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babes-Bolyai University.
    2. Rodrigo Lozano & Maria Barreiro‐Gen & Janna Pietikäinen & Carmen Gago‐Cortes & Claudio Favi & Maria Teresa Jimenez Munguia & Ferenc Monus & João Simão & Javier Benayas & Cheryl Desha & Sevket Bostanci, 2022. "Adopting sustainability competence‐based education in academic disciplines: Insights from 13 higher education institutions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 620-635, August.
    3. Rodrigo Lozano, 2015. "A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 32-44, January.
    4. Rodrigo Lozano & Robin von Haartman, 2018. "Reinforcing the Holistic Perspective of Sustainability: Analysis of the Importance of Sustainability Drivers in Organizations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 508-522, July.
    5. Robin L. Wakefield & Dorothy E. Leidner & Gary Garrison, 2008. "Research Note ---A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 434-455, December.
    6. Rodrigo Lozano, 2018. "Proposing a Definition and a Framework of Organisational Sustainability: A Review of Efforts and a Survey of Approaches to Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:03:y:1999:i:02:n:s1363919699000074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.