IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/acsxxx/v25y2022i07ns0219525922500102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking The Influential Nodes In Complex Networks

Author

Listed:
  • OWAIS A. HUSSAIN

    (Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan)

  • MAAZ BIN AHMAD

    (Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan)

  • FARAZ A. ZAIDI

    (��York University, Toronto, Canada)

Abstract

Among diverse topics in complex network analysis, the idea of extracting a small set of nodes which can maximally influence other nodes in the network has a variety of applications, especially for e-marketing and social networking. While there is an abundance of heuristics to identify such influential nodes, the method of quantifying the influence itself, has not been investigated in the research community. Most of the classical and state-of-the-art works use Diffusion tests for influence benchmark of a particular set of nodes in the network. The underlying study challenges this method and conducts thorough experiments to show that for real-world applications, the diffusion test alone is not only insufficient, but in some cases is also an inaccurate method of benchmarking. Using eight widely adopted heuristics, 25 networks were tested using Diffusion tests and compared with resilience test, we found out that no single algorithm performs consistently on both types of tests. Thus, we conclude that a more accurate way of benchmarking a set of influential nodes is to run diffusion tests alongside resilience test, in order to label a certain technique as best performer.

Suggested Citation

  • Owais A. Hussain & Maaz Bin Ahmad & Faraz A. Zaidi, 2022. "Benchmarking The Influential Nodes In Complex Networks," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(07), pages 1-33, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:25:y:2022:i:07:n:s0219525922500102
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219525922500102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219525922500102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219525922500102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:25:y:2022:i:07:n:s0219525922500102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/acs/acs.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.