IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/acsxxx/v16y2013i06ns0219525913500203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Consensus Under Opinion Bias By Means Of Hierarchical Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • NICOLAS PERONY

    (ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • RENÉ PFITZNER

    (ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • INGO SCHOLTES

    (ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • CLAUDIO J. TESSONE

    (ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • FRANK SCHWEITZER

    (ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

We study the role of hierarchical structures in a simple model of collective consensus formation based on the bounded confidence model with continuous individual opinions. For the particular variation of this model considered in this paper, we assume that a bias toward an extreme opinion is introduced whenever two individuals interact and form a common decision. As a simple proxy for hierarchical social structures, we introduce a two-step decision making process in which in the second step groups of like-minded individuals are replaced by representatives once they have reached local consensus, and the representatives in turn form a collective decision in a downstream process. We find that the introduction of such a hierarchical decision making structure can improve consensus formation, in the sense that the eventual collective opinion is closer to the true average of individual opinions than without it. In particular, we numerically study how the size of groups of like-minded individuals being represented by delegate individuals affects the impact of the bias on the final population-wide consensus. These results are of interest for the design of organizational policies and the optimization of hierarchical structures in the context of group decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Perony & René Pfitzner & Ingo Scholtes & Claudio J. Tessone & Frank Schweitzer, 2013. "Enhancing Consensus Under Opinion Bias By Means Of Hierarchical Decision Making," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:16:y:2013:i:06:n:s0219525913500203
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219525913500203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219525913500203
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219525913500203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. F. Jacobs & S. Galam, 2019. "Two-Opinions-Dynamics Generated By Inflexibles And Non-Contrarian And Contrarian Floaters," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-30, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:16:y:2013:i:06:n:s0219525913500203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/acs/acs.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.