IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wri/journl/v40y2017i2p125-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Diversification Relatedness on Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Brandon C.L. Morris
  • Stephen G. Fier
  • Andre P. Liebenberg

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between diversification relatedness and firm performance in the U.S. property‐liability insurance industry. While prior research has evaluated the effect of diversification on insurer performance, little evidence exists regarding the relation between diversification strategy and performance for diversified firms. Theory suggests that potential costs and benefits are associated with related and unrelated forms of diversification and that these can vary along the relatedness continuum. We test for the net effect of diversification strategy and find that relatedness negatively impacts accounting performance. This relatedness penalty is robust to corrections for potential endogeneity bias, it exists for newly diversifying firms, and it has a differential effect on stock and mutual insurers. Finally, we find that related diversification is largely responsible for the diversification penalty found in prior research while unrelated diversification has no relation to accounting performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandon C.L. Morris & Stephen G. Fier & Andre P. Liebenberg, 2017. "The Effect of Diversification Relatedness on Firm Performance," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 40(2), pages 125-158.
  • Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:40:y:2017:i:2:p:125-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.insuranceissues.org/PDFs/402MFL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Courtney B. Baggett & Cassandra R. Cole & George Crowley & E. Tice Sirmans, 2020. "Spillover effects of increased health insurance enrollment on workers’ compensation insurance," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(1), pages 53-74, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:40:y:2017:i:2:p:125-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: James Barrese (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.