IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wri/journl/v31y2008i1p75-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limitations on Punitive Damages Against Insurers Since State Farm v. Campbell: Lessons for Insurers

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony W. Morris
  • J. Stephen Berry
  • P. Michael Freed

Abstract

This article focuses on the limitations imposed on punitive damages awards by the United States Supreme Court, concentrating tm how these limitations have been applied by lower courts in actions against insurance companies. The article begins by examining the Supreme Court's three "guideposts" for determining whether a punitive award complies with due process. The article focuses on the compensatory damages predicate for determining a punitive award pursuant to the second "guide­ post" requiring trial courts to examine the ratio between actual and potential harm and the punitive award. The article examines what types of damages have been included in the predicate in bad-faith claims against insurers, and argues that under black-letter contract law, only the plaintiff's bad-faith tort damages should be included in the actual or potential harm side of the ratio. Finally, the article examines how the "reprehensibility" of insurers' conduct has affected punitive awards against insurers.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony W. Morris & J. Stephen Berry & P. Michael Freed, 2008. "Limitations on Punitive Damages Against Insurers Since State Farm v. Campbell: Lessons for Insurers," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 31(2), pages 75-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:31:y:2008:i:1:p:75-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.insuranceissues.org/PDFs/312MBF.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:31:y:2008:i:1:p:75-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: James Barrese (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.