The Fallacy of Social Security as a Regressive Tax
AbstractThe Social Security payroll tax is commonly viewed as a regressive tax that falls heavily on low income groups. The primary purpose of this paper is to determine if social insurance taxes, primarily the Social Security payroll tax, are regressive, and whether such regressivity, if any, has increased over time. The major conclusion is that based on certain realistic assumptions and tax burden ratios, the Social Security payroll tax is actually a progressive tax over the vast majority of family incomes and is regressive only over the highest incomes received by a small proportion of upper-income families. The public policy implications of this finding are analyzed in the study.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Western Risk and Insurance Association in its journal Journal of Insurance Issues.
Volume (Year): 16 (1993)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Contact details of provider:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (James Barrese).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.