IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v21y2018i6p511-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physics of failure‐based failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis for Integrated Circuits

Author

Listed:
  • Wenhao Qiu
  • Guangyao Lian
  • Mingxi Xue
  • Kaoli Huang

Abstract

Existing failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) methods, which still rely mainly on failure data and the empirical information of designers, suffer from subjectivity and inflexibility, which makes the application of these methods on electronic equipment, especially integrated circuit‐based equipment, less credible. Therefore, the idea of physics of failure (PoF)‐based FMECA is presented. First, the relationship between typical failure modes and the failure mechanisms of integrated circuits is analyzed. Based on the results, pseudo‐random samples are generated using a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. Then, the hybrid hypothesis test method is proposed to determine the failure distribution function, and then a mixed failure rate model based on failure factors is established to calculate the rates of failure modes. This method is applied to a main control module of a control system to correct the original FMECA results. Results show that this method has good applicability to the FMECA of integrated circuits and can obtain more objective and accurate analysis results compared to traditional methods, while being more applicable for testability verification tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenhao Qiu & Guangyao Lian & Mingxi Xue & Kaoli Huang, 2018. "Physics of failure‐based failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis for Integrated Circuits," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(6), pages 511-519, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:21:y:2018:i:6:p:511-519
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21451
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:21:y:2018:i:6:p:511-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.