IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v20y2017i5p447-466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model‐Based Project‐Product Lifecycle Management and Gantt Chart Models: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Amira Sharon
  • Dov Dori

Abstract

Systems engineering (SE) and project management (PM) are two complementary disciplines that aim at achieving a common goal. In order for systems engineers and project managers to communicate efficiently, there is a need for a common language that balances system performance, quality, stakeholder expectations and needs, cost, and schedule. We use Object Process Methodology (OPM) as the basis for Project‐Product Lifecycle Management (PPLM), where SE and PM are complementary parts of an overarching system. Since the project plan is one of the first artifacts that both SE and PM professionals should agree on, we compared Gantt chart, a commonly used method, and a PPLM project plan. We present a three‐stage comparative research, investigating how differences between a Gantt chart and an OPM model‐based PPLM project plan are perceived by mid‐career systems engineers, who were graduate students in systems engineering academic programs. The outcomes indicate that the comprehension of information contained in the OPM model‐based PPLM project plan is more easily grasped than the same information presented via the Gantt chart. The results suggest that PPLM has the potential to better clarify the intricate relationships between SE and PM involved in developing systems through projects. It can enable better understanding and communication between systems engineers and project managers, thereby improving decision‐making, project outcomes, and product performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Amira Sharon & Dov Dori, 2017. "Model‐Based Project‐Product Lifecycle Management and Gantt Chart Models: A Comparative Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5), pages 447-466, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:20:y:2017:i:5:p:447-466
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21407
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos A. Osorio & Dov Dori & Joseph Sussman, 2011. "COIM: An object‐process based method for analyzing architectures of complex, interconnected, large‐scale socio‐technical systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 364-382, December.
    2. Amira Sharon & Olivier L. de Weck & Dov Dori, 2011. "Project management vs. systems engineering management: A practitioners' view on integrating the project and product domains," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 427-440, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amira Sharon & Olivier L. de Weck & Dov Dori, 2013. "Improving Project–Product Lifecycle Management with Model–Based Design Structure Matrix: A joint project management and systems engineering approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 413-426, December.
    2. Shiva Abdoli & Sami Kara, 2017. "A Modelling Framework to Design Executable Logical Architecture of Engineering Systems," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-75, September.
    3. Kim Davis & Thomas Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2013. "Architecting technology transitions: A sustainability‐oriented sociotechnical approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 193-212, June.
    4. Izack Cohen & Michal Iluz & Avraham Shtub, 2014. "A Simulation‐Based Approach in Support of Project Management Training for Systems Engineers," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 26-36, March.
    5. Christos Ellinas & Neil Allan & Anders Johansson, 2016. "Exploring Structural Patterns Across Evolved and Designed Systems: A Network Perspective," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 179-192, May.
    6. John Wood & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi & Timothy Eveleigh, 2013. "A framework for capturing the hidden stakeholder system," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 251-266, September.
    7. Marcus A. Bellamy & Rahul C. Basole, 2013. "Network analysis of supply chain systems: A systematic review and future research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 235-249, June.
    8. Fabian Heitmann & Johannes Halbe & Claudia Pahl-Wostl, 2019. "Integrated and Participatory Design of Sustainable Development Strategies on Multiple Governance Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-27, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:20:y:2017:i:5:p:447-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.