IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v15y2012i1p108-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating the NATO Human View in the DoDAF 2.0 Meta Model

Author

Listed:
  • Holly A. H. Handley

Abstract

The NATO Human View is an additional viewpoint for an architecture framework that provides information on the human in the system. This paper represents the last of three papers describing the NATO Human View. The first paper described the development of the Human View by a multinational NATO panel [Handley and Smillie, Syst Eng 11(2) (2008), 156–164]. The second paper described a methodology to use the Human View data in a simulation model in order to demonstrate the impact of the human on system performance [Handley and Smillie, Syst Eng 13(1) (2010), 72–79]. This final paper describes a methodology to align the NATO Human View with the Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) 2.0 Meta Model (DM2) in order to produce “Fit for Purpose” views. These views can be used to augment the standard sets of architectural products with human‐centered information important to the system description. The alignment of the Human View with the DM2 also facilitates reconciliation of different interpretations of the Human View construct. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng

Suggested Citation

  • Holly A. H. Handley, 2012. "Incorporating the NATO Human View in the DoDAF 2.0 Meta Model," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 108-117, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:108-117
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holly A. H. Handley & Robert J. Smillie, 2008. "Architecture framework human view: The NATO approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 156-164, June.
    2. Holly A. H. Handley & Robert J. Smillie, 2010. "Human view dynamics—The NATO approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 72-79, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Holly A. H. Handley, 2016. "A Design Methodology for Fit‐for‐Purpose Human Views," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(6), pages 498-509, November.
    2. John M. Colombi & Michael E. Miller & Michael Schneider & Major Jason McGrogan & Colonel David S. Long & John Plaga, 2012. "Predictive mental workload modeling for semiautonomous system design: Implications for systems of systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 448-460, December.
    3. Anandhi Vivekanandan Dhukaram & Chris Baber, 2016. "A Systematic Approach for Developing Decision Aids: From Cognitive Work Analysis to Prototype Design and Development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 79-100, March.
    4. Holly A. H. Handley & Robert J. Smillie, 2010. "Human view dynamics—The NATO approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 72-79, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:108-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.