IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v31y2023i5p3161-3174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does policy coherence shape effectiveness and inequality? Implications for sustainable development and the 2030 Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Browne
  • Adis Dzebo
  • Gabriela Iacobuta
  • Alexia Faus Onbargi
  • Zoha Shawoo
  • Ines Dombrowsky
  • Mathias Fridahl
  • Sara Gottenhuber
  • Åsa Persson

Abstract

During the formulation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, many promoted policy coherence as a key tool to ensure achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in a way that “leaves no one behind.” Their argument assumed that coherent policymaking contributes to more effective policies and supports over‐arching efforts to reduce inequality. As the 2030 Agenda reaches the halfway point, however, countries are falling short on many SDGs, particularly SDG 10 (reduce inequality). This study revisits the basic assumptions about policy coherence underpinning the SDGs. We systematically screened the peer‐reviewed literature to identify 40 studies that provide evidence about whether coherent policymaking contributes to more effective outcomes and helps to reduce inequality. We find that coherent policymaking did not help reduce inequality in a majority of cases and made it worse in several. Our findings challenge the narrative that coherence is a necessary pre‐condition for progress on the SDGs for all people.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Browne & Adis Dzebo & Gabriela Iacobuta & Alexia Faus Onbargi & Zoha Shawoo & Ines Dombrowsky & Mathias Fridahl & Sara Gottenhuber & Åsa Persson, 2023. "How does policy coherence shape effectiveness and inequality? Implications for sustainable development and the 2030 Agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3161-3174, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:5:p:3161-3174
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2598
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:5:p:3161-3174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.