IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v90y2024i3p577-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are menthol smokers different? An economic perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yu‐Chun Elisa Cheng
  • Don Kenkel
  • Alan Mathios
  • Hua Wang

Abstract

More than 18.5 million current smokers in the United States usually smoke menthol cigarettes. The Food and Drug Administration recently proposed a tobacco product standard to prohibit menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes. We explore whether there are internality‐based market failures that provide an applied welfare economics rationale to prohibit menthol. Our empirical approach provides descriptive evidence from the 2018 to 2019 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey on how menthol use is associated with smokers' market demand along multiple intensive and extensive margins. We also use measures of smoking‐related misinformation and internalities, and stated preference data, from a 2021 Cornell Online Survey. We acknowledge that the associations we document in observational data might reflect bias due to self‐selection into menthol use. We leave it to the reader whether there is convincing evidence that differential levels of internality‐based market failures are a sufficient justification for the proposed prohibition of menthol cigarettes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu‐Chun Elisa Cheng & Don Kenkel & Alan Mathios & Hua Wang, 2024. "Are menthol smokers different? An economic perspective," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 90(3), pages 577-611, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:90:y:2024:i:3:p:577-611
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.12668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12668
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.12668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:90:y:2024:i:3:p:577-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.