IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v37y2017i6p1072-1081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the World Health Organization Measles Programmatic Risk Assessment Tool Using Experience from the 2009 Measles Outbreak in Namibia

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer L. Kriss
  • Roselina J. De Wee
  • Eugene Lam
  • Reinhard Kaiser
  • Messeret E. Shibeshi
  • Emmy‐Else Ndevaetela
  • Clementine Muroua
  • Nicholaus Shapumba
  • Balcha G. Masresha
  • James L. Goodson

Abstract

In the World Health Organization (WHO) African region, reported measles cases decreased by 80% and measles mortality declined by 88% during 2000–2012. Based on current performance trends, however, focused efforts will be needed to achieve the regional measles elimination goal. To prioritize efforts to strengthen implementation of elimination strategies, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and WHO developed a measles programmatic risk assessment tool to identify high‐risk districts and guide and strengthen program activities at the subnational level. This article provides a description of pilot testing of the tool in Namibia using comparisons of high‐risk districts identified using 2006–2008 data with reported measles cases and incidence during the 2009 outbreak. Of the 34 health districts in Namibia, 11 (32%) were classified as high risk or very high risk, including the district of Engela where the outbreak began in 2009. The district of Windhoek, including the capital city of Windhoek, had the highest overall risk score—driven primarily by poor population immunity and immunization program performance—and one of the highest incidences during the outbreak. Other high‐risk districts were either around the capital district or in the northern part of the country near the border with Angola. Districts categorized as high or very high risk based on the 2006–2008 data generally experienced high measles incidence during the large outbreak in 2009, as did several medium‐ or low‐risk districts. The tool can be used to guide measles elimination strategies and to identify programmatic areas that require strengthening.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer L. Kriss & Roselina J. De Wee & Eugene Lam & Reinhard Kaiser & Messeret E. Shibeshi & Emmy‐Else Ndevaetela & Clementine Muroua & Nicholaus Shapumba & Balcha G. Masresha & James L. Goodson, 2017. "Development of the World Health Organization Measles Programmatic Risk Assessment Tool Using Experience from the 2009 Measles Outbreak in Namibia," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 1072-1081, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:6:p:1072-1081
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12544
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eugene Lam & W. William Schluter & Balcha G. Masresha & Nadia Teleb & Pamela Bravo‐Alcántara & Abigail Shefer & Dragan Jankovic & Jeffrey McFarland & Eltayeb Elfakki & Yoshihiro Takashima & Robert T. , 2017. "Development of a District‐Level Programmatic Assessment Tool for Risk of Measles Virus Transmission," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 1052-1062, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:6:p:1072-1081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.