IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v27y2007i5p1381-1394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Water Quality Failures in Distribution Networks—Risk Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic and Evidential Reasoning

Author

Listed:
  • Rehan Sadiq
  • Yehuda Kleiner
  • Balvant Rajani

Abstract

The evaluation of the risk of water quality failures in a distribution network is a challenging task given that much of the available data are highly uncertain and vague, and many of the mechanisms are not fully understood. Consequently, a systematic approach is required to handle quantitative‐qualitative data as well as a means to update existing information when new knowledge and data become available. Five general pathways (mechanisms) through which a water quality failure can occur in the distribution network are identified in this article. These include contaminant intrusion, leaching and corrosion, biofilm formation and microbial regrowth, permeation, and water treatment breakthrough (including disinfection byproducts formation). The proposed methodology is demonstrated using a simplified example for water quality failures in a distribution network. This article builds upon the previous developments of aggregative risk analysis approach. Each basic risk item in a hierarchical framework is expressed by a triangular fuzzy number, which is derived from the composition of the likelihood of a failure event and the associated failure consequence. An analytic hierarchy process is used to estimate weights required for grouping noncommensurate risk sources. The evidential reasoning is proposed to incorporate newly arrived data for the updating of existing risk estimates. The exponential ordered weighted averaging operators are used for defuzzification to incorporate attitudinal dimension for risk management. It is envisaged that the proposed approach could serve as a basis to benchmark acceptable risks in water distribution networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Rehan Sadiq & Yehuda Kleiner & Balvant Rajani, 2007. "Water Quality Failures in Distribution Networks—Risk Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic and Evidential Reasoning," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 1381-1394, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:27:y:2007:i:5:p:1381-1394
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00972.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00972.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00972.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jakub Żywiec & Izabela Piegdoń & Barbara Tchórzewska-Cieślak, 2019. "Failure Analysis of the Water Supply Network in the Aspect of Climate Changes on the Example of the Central and Eastern Europe Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Michael Greenberg, 2012. "Our Deteriorating Physical Structures and Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(12), pages 2008-2009, December.
    3. Shital A. Thekdi & James H. Lambert, 2012. "Decision Analysis and Risk Models for Land Development Affecting Infrastructure Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(7), pages 1253-1269, July.
    4. M. Shafiqul Islam & Rehan Sadiq & Manuel J. Rodriguez & Homayoun Najjaran & Alex Francisque & Mina Hoorfar, 2014. "Water distribution system failure: a framework for forensic analysis," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 168-179, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:27:y:2007:i:5:p:1381-1394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.