IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v23y2003i1p179-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Microbial Growth Within Food Safety Risk Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Ross
  • Thomas Alexander McMeekin

Abstract

Risk estimates for food‐borne infection will usually depend heavily on numbers of microorganisms present on the food at the time of consumption. As these data are seldom available directly, attention has turned to predictive microbiology as a means of inferring exposure at consumption. Codex guidelines recommend that microbiological risk assessment should explicitly consider the dynamics of microbiological growth, survival, and death in foods. This article describes predictive models and resources for modeling microbial growth in foods, and their utility and limitations in food safety risk assessment. We also aim to identify tools, data, and knowledge sources, and to provide an understanding of the microbial ecology of foods so that users can recognize model limits, avoid modeling unrealistic scenarios, and thus be able to appreciate the levels of confidence they can have in the outputs of predictive microbiology models. The microbial ecology of foods is complex. Developing reliable risk assessments involving microbial growth in foods will require the skills of both microbial ecologists and mathematical modelers. Simplifying assumptions will need to be made, but because of the potential for apparently small errors in growth rate to translate into very large errors in the estimate of risk, the validity of those assumptions should be carefully assessed. Quantitative estimates of absolute microbial risk within narrow confidence intervals do not yet appear to be possible. Nevertheless, the expression of microbial ecology knowledge in “predictive microbiology” models does allow decision support using the tools of risk assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Ross & Thomas Alexander McMeekin, 2003. "Modeling Microbial Growth Within Food Safety Risk Assessments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 179-197, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:23:y:2003:i:1:p:179-197
    DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00299
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1539-6924.00299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arnout R. Standaert & Kjell Francois & Frank Devlieghere & Johan Debevere & Jan F. Van Impe & Annemie H. Geeraerd, 2007. "Modeling Individual Cell Lag Time Distributions for Listeria monocytogenes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 241-254, February.
    2. Arnout R. H. Fischer & Aarieke E. I. De Jong & Rob De Jonge & Lynn J. Frewer & Maarten J. Nauta, 2005. "Improving Food Safety in the Domestic Environment: The Need for a Transdisciplinary Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 503-517, June.
    3. Hajo Rijgersberg & Seth Tromp & Liesbeth Jacxsens & Mieke Uyttendaele, 2010. "Modeling Logistic Performance in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 20-31, January.
    4. K. Francois & F. Devlieghere & M. Uyttendaele & J. Debevere, 2006. "Risk Assessment of Listeria monocytogenes: Impact of Individual Cell Variability on the Exposure Assessment Step," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 105-114, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:23:y:2003:i:1:p:179-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.