IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v21y2001i3p513-532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Chemical Accident Risk Assessment Thesaurus: A Tool for Analyzing and Comparing Diverse Risk Assessment Processes and Definitions

Author

Listed:
  • A. J. Ignatowski
  • I. Rosenthal

Abstract

The Chemical Accident Risk Assessment Thesaurus (CARAT) is a database of the laws, regulations, guidance documents, and definitions of terms related to the risk assessment of accidental releases of chemicals from fixed installations. The database also contains information on the application of risk assessment methodologies to specific examples of potential chemical releases. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development urged the development of the Thesaurus to improve the communication among the member countries about the risk assessment of hazardous installations. The difficulty of communication is based in large part on the fact that certain “terms of art” have different meanings in different countries and cultures, or that different terms of art are used to address the same concept. The CARAT is designed to circumvent these difficulties, and is especially useful as a tool to analyze the definitions of terms related to risk assessment. Entries into the CARAT contain information from various international, national, and regional agencies that relate to risk assessment processes and definitions focused on accidental chemical releases. The entire system is accessible via the Internet. Retrieval of information from the CARAT is facilitated by five different searching tools: two of them are designed to search the CARAT for its entries. One facility is designed to search for laws and regulations, specific risk assessment cases (SRA), and risk assessment guidance documents (RAG) related to chemical accidents. The second search facility deals with entries of definitions. The design of the CARAT is ideally suited to capture the sense of definitions that are expressed as either a procedural definition (an “operation on a concept”) or a conceptual definitions (just the “concept”). A powerful third query tool is the “Comparison” facility. This query tool allows the user to compare the details CARAT entries of laws and regulations, SRA, RAG, or definitions, in any combination. The remaining two tools can perform searches by identifying entries that contain either certain combinations of hierarchical or descriptor details. Both types can be conducted in Boolean “and/or” mode.

Suggested Citation

  • A. J. Ignatowski & I. Rosenthal, 2001. "The Chemical Accident Risk Assessment Thesaurus: A Tool for Analyzing and Comparing Diverse Risk Assessment Processes and Definitions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 513-532, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:21:y:2001:i:3:p:513-532
    DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.213129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.213129
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0272-4332.213129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongyou Nie & Jinbu Zhao & Yiyi Zhang & Jizhi Zhou, 2020. "Risk Evaluation of “Not-In-My-Back-Yard” Conflict Potential in Facilities Group: A Case Study of Chemical Park in Xuwei New District, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:21:y:2001:i:3:p:513-532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.