IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v20y2000i2p245-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Percentiles of the Product of Uncertainty Factors for Establishing Probabilistic Reference Doses

Author

Listed:
  • David W. Gaylor
  • Ralph L. Kodell

Abstract

Exposure guidelines for potentially toxic substances are often based on a reference dose (RfD) that is determined by dividing a no‐observed‐adverse‐effect‐level (NOAEL), lowest‐observed‐adverse‐effect‐level (LOAEL), or benchmark dose (BD) corresponding to a low level of risk, by a product of uncertainty factors. The uncertainty factors for animal to human extrapolation, variable sensitivities among humans, extrapolation from measured subchronic effects to unknown results for chronic exposures, and extrapolation from a LOAEL to a NOAEL can be thought of as random variables that vary from chemical to chemical. Selected databases are examined that provide distributions across chemicals of inter‐ and intraspecies effects, ratios of LOAELs to NOAELs, and differences in acute and chronic effects, to illustrate the determination of percentiles for uncertainty factors. The distributions of uncertainty factors tend to be approximately lognormally distributed. The logarithm of the product of independent uncertainty factors is approximately distributed as the sum of normally distributed variables, making it possible to estimate percentiles for the product. Hence, the size of the products of uncertainty factors can be selected to provide adequate safety for a large percentage (e.g., approximately 95%) of RfDs. For the databases used to describe the distributions of uncertainty factors, using values of 10 appear to be reasonable and conservative. For the databases examined the following simple ‘Rule of 3s’ is suggested that exceeds the estimated 95th percentile of the product of uncertainty factors: If only a single uncertainty factor is required use 33, for any two uncertainty factors use 3 × 33 ≈ 100, for any three uncertainty factors use a combined factor of 3 × 100 = 300, and if all four uncertainty factors are needed use a total factor of 3 × 300 = 900. If near the 99th percentile is desired use another factor of 3. An additional factor may be needed for inadequate data or a modifying factor for other uncertainties (e.g., different routes of exposure) not covered above.

Suggested Citation

  • David W. Gaylor & Ralph L. Kodell, 2000. "Percentiles of the Product of Uncertainty Factors for Establishing Probabilistic Reference Doses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 245-250, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:20:y:2000:i:2:p:245-250
    DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.202023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0272-4332.202023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clausen, Jonas & Hansson, Sven Ove & Nilsson, Fred, 2006. "Generalizing the safety factor approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(8), pages 964-973.
    2. Richard R. Lester & Laura C. Green & Igor Linkov, 2007. "Site‐Specific Applications of Probabilistic Health Risk Assessment: Review of the Literature Since 2000," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 635-658, June.
    3. Paul S. Price & Heli M. Hollnagel & Jack M. Zabik, 2009. "Characterizing the Noncancer Toxicity of Mixtures Using Concepts from the TTC and Quantitative Models of Uncertainty in Mixture Toxicity," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11), pages 1534-1548, November.
    4. Roger Cooke, 2010. "Conundrums with Uncertainty Factors," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 330-339, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:20:y:2000:i:2:p:245-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.