IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v19y1999i3p511-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity of Concentration and Risk Predictions in the PRESTO and MMSOILS Multimedia Models: Regression Technique Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • William B. Mills
  • Christine S. Lew
  • Cheng Y. Hung

Abstract

This paper describes the application of two multimedia models, PRESTO and MMSOILS, to predict contaminant migration from a landfill that contains an organic chemical (methylene chloride) and a radionuclide (uranium‐238). Exposure point concentrations and human health risks are predicted, and distributions of those predictions are generated using Monte Carlo techniques. Analysis of exposure point concentrations shows that predictions of uranium‐238 in groundwater differ by more than one order of magnitude between models. These differences occur mainly because PRESTO simulates uranium‐238 transport through the groundwater using a one‐dimensional algorithm and vertically mixes the plume over an effective mixing depth, whereas MMSOILS uses a three‐dimensional algorithm and simulates a plume that resides near the surface of the aquifer. A sensitivity analysis, using stepwise multiple linear regression, is performed to evaluate which of the random variables are most important in producing the predicted distributions of exposure point concentrations and health risks. The sensitivity analysis shows that the predicted distributions can be accurately reproduced using a small subset of the random variables. Simple regression techniques are applied, for comparison, to the same scenarios, and results are similar. The practical implication of this analysis is the ability to distinguish between important versus unimportant random variables in terms of their sensitivity to selected endpoints.

Suggested Citation

  • William B. Mills & Christine S. Lew & Cheng Y. Hung, 1999. "Sensitivity of Concentration and Risk Predictions in the PRESTO and MMSOILS Multimedia Models: Regression Technique Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 511-525, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:19:y:1999:i:3:p:511-525
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00425.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00425.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00425.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerard F. Laniak & James G. Droppo & Ernest R. Faillace & Emmanuel K. Gnanapragasam & William B. Mills & Dennis L. Strenge & Gene Whelan & Charley Yu, 1997. "An Overview of a Multimedia Benchmarking Analysis for Three Risk Assessment Models: RESRAD, MMSOILS, and MEPAS," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 203-214, April.
    2. William B. Mills & J. J. Cheng & James G. Droppo & Ernest R. Faillace & Emmanuel K. Gnanapragasam & Robert A. Johns & Gerard F. Laniak & Christine S. Lew & Dennis L. Strenge & Jonna F. Sutherland & Ge, 1997. "Multimedia Benchmarking Analysis for Three Risk Assessment Models: RESRAD, MMSOILS, and MEPAS," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 187-201, April.
    3. Randall D. Manteufel, 1996. "Variance‐Based Importance Analysis Applied to a Complex Probabilistic Performance Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 587-598, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heather A. Jones‐Otazo & Miriam L. Diamond & G. Mark Richardson, 2005. "An Interagency Comparison of Screening‐Level Risk Assessment Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 841-853, August.
    2. William B. Mills & J. J. Cheng & James G. Droppo & Ernest R. Faillace & Emmanuel K. Gnanapragasam & Robert A. Johns & Gerard F. Laniak & Christine S. Lew & Dennis L. Strenge & Jonna F. Sutherland & Ge, 1997. "Multimedia Benchmarking Analysis for Three Risk Assessment Models: RESRAD, MMSOILS, and MEPAS," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 187-201, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:19:y:1999:i:3:p:511-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.