IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v17y2023i4p944-953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mandatory due diligence laws and climate change litigation: Bridging the corporate climate accountability gap?

Author

Listed:
  • Mikko Rajavuori
  • Annalisa Savaresi
  • Harro van Asselt

Abstract

The debate on corporate climate accountability has become increasingly prominent in recent years. Several countries, particularly in the Global North, have adopted mandatory human rights and/or environmental due diligence legislation. At the same time, judicial and quasi‐judicial proceedings are helping to shape the contours of corporate climate accountability. This article considers how litigation against corporations and due diligence legislation interact, and thereby help develop and strengthen corporate climate accountability. While the practice in this area is still limited, there is scope to reflect on early developments and how they may influence both future climate litigation as well as ongoing and future law‐making on due diligence. We first review recent developments in climate litigation against corporations, focusing on the extent to which they rely on climate due diligence obligations. We then survey existing and proposed due diligence legislation, examining the extent to which it addresses corporate climate accountability. Finally, we identify scenarios of how due diligence legislation and climate litigation may interact and possibly converge to strengthen corporate climate accountability. We furthermore identify knowledge gaps and areas for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikko Rajavuori & Annalisa Savaresi & Harro van Asselt, 2023. "Mandatory due diligence laws and climate change litigation: Bridging the corporate climate accountability gap?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 944-953, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:4:p:944-953
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12518
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:4:p:944-953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.