IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v17y2023i4p909-926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From voluntary to mandatory corporate accountability: The politics of the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act

Author

Listed:
  • David Weihrauch
  • Sophia Carodenuto
  • Sina Leipold

Abstract

Following a long‐standing and highly contested policy debate, in June 2021, the German parliament passed the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act requiring mandatory due diligence (MDD) of large companies, holding them accountable for the impacts of their supply chain operations abroad. Applying the discursive agency approach and using evidence from policy documents and 21 interviews with key stakeholders, we analyze the political strategies that paved the way toward MDD in Germany. The decisive strategy was an innovative benchmarking and monitoring mechanism that provided the legitimacy for a law and opened a window of opportunity for MDD supporters. Civil society and supportive politicians used this window of opportunity to build broad political coalitions that included the support of some companies. We discuss the ramifications of these findings for understanding the domestic politics behind the newly emerging norm of foreign corporate accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • David Weihrauch & Sophia Carodenuto & Sina Leipold, 2023. "From voluntary to mandatory corporate accountability: The politics of the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 909-926, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:4:p:909-926
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12501
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:4:p:909-926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.