IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v17y2023i3p677-693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hardening foreign corporate accountability through mandatory due diligence in the European Union? New trends and persisting challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Almut Schilling‐Vacaflor
  • Andrea Lenschow

Abstract

The negative externalities of global commodity chains and existing governance gaps have received wide scholarly attention. Indeed, many sectors including forest‐risk commodities (FRCs) like soy and beef from Brazil remain largely unregulated. This article analyzes ongoing policy‐making processes at European Union level to adopt new regulations for reducing accountability gaps: one regulation of FRCs and one general, cross‐sectoral directive on human rights and environmental due diligence. This article draws on and aims to contribute to previous research into foreign corporate accountability, therein analytically distinguishing between input, output, and surrogate accountability. This study shows that new policies will likely be more comprehensive than previous supply chain regulations, while their specific institutional design and stringency are highly contested. More in general, we argue that for hardening corporate accountability, due diligence politics will need to confront important governance challenges that have limited the potential of previous regulations, such as a lack of consequentiality of reporting obligations, weak state monitoring, limited stakeholder involvement, and difficulties to establish legal liability.

Suggested Citation

  • Almut Schilling‐Vacaflor & Andrea Lenschow, 2023. "Hardening foreign corporate accountability through mandatory due diligence in the European Union? New trends and persisting challenges," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 677-693, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:3:p:677-693
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12402
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:17:y:2023:i:3:p:677-693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.