IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/povpop/v2y2010i3p17-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Tale of Three Commissions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Author

Listed:
  • Eric R. Kingson

Abstract

Eric Kingson was an advisor to the 1982 National Commission on Social Security Reform and to the 1994 Bipartisan Commission on Entitlements and Tax Reform. Drawing on the experience of 1982 (the “Good”) and 1994 (the “Bad”) commissions, he concludes that the fast‐track debt commission as proposed by Senators Kent Conrad and Judd Gregg would result in an unprecedented and deleterious approach to Social Security policy‐making. The structure and functioning of the 1994 commission provides insight into likely goals and functioning of the Conrad‐Gregg Commission, a commission Kingson suggests would be akin to the 1994 entitlement commission “on steroids.” Noting the disregard for traditional congressional processes and the mischaracterization of Social Security as part of a unified “entitlements” problem, Kingson concludes that Senator Max Baucus is not exaggerating when he warned on the Senate floor that “Senators Conrad and Gregg have painted a big red target on Social Security and Medicare. That's what this commission is all about.”

Suggested Citation

  • Eric R. Kingson, 2010. "A Tale of Three Commissions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 17-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:17-27
    DOI: 10.2202/1944-2858.1120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2858.1120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1944-2858.1120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:17-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-2858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.