IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/povpop/v10y2018i2p222-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Political Science Relevant? The Decline of Critical Scholarly Engagement in the Neoliberal Era

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony DiMaggio

Abstract

This essay relies on a participant‐observation method, among other approaches, to analyze structural and professional changes in Political Science over the last few decades. I document the rise of neoliberalism in Political Science via 6 major changes to the discipline, including: the rise of scholarly “objectivity” as a means of deterring critical analysis, the decline of public intellectualism and publicly accessible studies, the marginalization of practically relevant research, the decline of methodological pluralism and the rise of methodological fetishism, the aversion to political philosophy and political theory, and the devaluation of teaching in favor of research. Proposals are provided for potential reforms to the discipline, for those interested in revitalizing the field and making it more practically relevant to politics and to the general public. 本文使用包括参与观察法在内的不同方法,分析了过去几十年里政治学的架构变化和专业变化。作者以该学科经历的6次重大变革,记录了新自由主义在政治学中的兴起,这6次重大变革包括:一、学术 “客观性” (objectivity)为遏制批判性分析而兴起;二、公共理性主义( public intellectualism)和可公开访问研究的衰落;三、实际相关研究的边缘化 ;四、方法论多元主义的衰落和方法论拜物教的兴起;五、对政治哲学和政治理论的厌恶;六、对注重研究的教学进行贬低。对于公众和那些有意重振该学科领域,并使该学科更切合政治实际情况的人而言,本文就该学科的潜在改革可能提了一些建议。 Este ensayo se apoya en el método de participación‐observación, entre otras aproximaciones, para analizar los cambios estructurales y profesionales en las ciencias políticas en las últimas décadas. Yo documento el alza del neoliberalismo en las ciencias políticas a través de 6 cambios importantes a la disciplina, incluyendo: el incremento de la “objetividad” académica como una forma para repeler el análisis crítico, la reducción del intelectualismo público y los estudios públicamente accesibles, la marginalización de la investigación prácticamente relevante, la reducción del pluralismo metodológico, la aversión a la filosofía política y a la teoría política y la devaluación de la enseñanza a favor de la investigación. Se proporcionan propuestas de reformas potenciales para la disciplina, para los que estén interesados en revitalizar el cambio y hacerlo más prácticamente relevante a la política y al público general.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony DiMaggio, 2018. "Is Political Science Relevant? The Decline of Critical Scholarly Engagement in the Neoliberal Era," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 222-252, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:222-252
    DOI: 10.1002/pop4.213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.213
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pop4.213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:222-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-2858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.