IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/perpro/v33y2022i1p46-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk assessment of engineering diseases of embankment–bridge transition section for railway in permafrost regions

Author

Listed:
  • Saize Zhang
  • Fujun Niu
  • Shi Wang
  • Yongning Sun
  • Jinchang Wang
  • Tianchun Dong

Abstract

The embankment–bridge transition section (EBTS) is one of the zones where railway diseases occur frequently in permafrost regions. Disease risk assessment of EBTSs can provide guidance for maintenance. In this study, considering the engineering geological conditions, climate characteristics, and embankment structure types along the Qinghai–Tibet Railway (QTR) as well as based on the disease inventory of the QTR from 2010 to 2019, the logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and combination‐weight‐based gay relation analysis (GRA) were used for disease risk assessment of the EBTSs along the QTR in permafrost regions. The results indicate that the LR and SVM models have a better capability for EBTS disease prediction than the GRA model, and the SVM model can select more disease samples in relatively larger regions than the LR model. Based on the SVM and LR models, the risk level of EBTSs is divided into four classes: low‐ (29.9%), moderate‐ (39.6%), high‐ (22.1%), and very high (8.4%) risk. Finally, we selected 272 EBTSs in high‐ and very‐high‐risk classes for key observation during the maintenance of the QTR in permafrost regions. This study provides a reference for the risk assessment of railways built in permafrost regions using data‐driven methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Saize Zhang & Fujun Niu & Shi Wang & Yongning Sun & Jinchang Wang & Tianchun Dong, 2022. "Risk assessment of engineering diseases of embankment–bridge transition section for railway in permafrost regions," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 46-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:46-62
    DOI: 10.1002/ppp.2135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2135
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ppp.2135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:46-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.