IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v39y2019i4-5p203-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The new architects: Brazil, China, and innovation in multilateral development lending

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Ramon Serrano Oswald

Abstract

Recent academic works have shed light upon the motives and negotiation dynamics leading to the creation of the New Development Bank (NDB) and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). We know less about their day‐to‐day activities and if (and if so why) they are being innovative in the field of multilateral development lending. This article evaluates novelty in the two banks. It uncovers and suggests an explanation to the puzzle of why the NDB appears more innovative (in terms of institutional design, staffing, and lending policy guidelines) than the AIIB by exploring the cases of China and Brazil. The two countries played central roles in the set‐up of each the AIIB and NDB. Drawing on extensive field research, the article proposes that their preferences and capability to engage in institutional innovation depend on interests, status, economic power, and regulatory capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Ramon Serrano Oswald, 2019. "The new architects: Brazil, China, and innovation in multilateral development lending," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(4-5), pages 203-214, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:39:y:2019:i:4-5:p:203-214
    DOI: 10.1002/pad.1837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1837
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pad.1837?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carol Brunt & John Casey, 2022. "The impacts of marketization on international aid: Transforming relationships among USAID vendors," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 167-178, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:39:y:2019:i:4-5:p:203-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.