IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v21y2019i1p4-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Placement replacement: A conceptual framework for designing simulated clinical placement in occupational therapy

Author

Listed:
  • Eli Mang Yee Chu
  • Loretta Sheppard
  • Stephen Guinea
  • Christine Imms

Abstract

Simulation is increasingly used to supplement clinical placement in preregistration health professional programs. However, there are no conceptual frameworks to guide the design of these learning experiences when replacing a clinical placement. In the present study, the conceptual framework for simulated clinical placements (CF‐SCP) is presented. Evolving from an iterative process of synthesizing learning and simulation theory, findings from the empirical literature, and the perspectives and ideas from experts in occupational therapy practice, education and simulation‐based learning, the CF‐SCP aligns principles and processes of workplace and simulation learning. The application of the CF‐SCP is described in the context of a 1 week full‐time SCP. The CF‐SCP provides a structure for organizing, understanding, and applying the principles and processes to design a simulated placement to be a “placement replacement” experience. Articulating a conceptual framework for the design of simulated placement experiences to replace actual clinical placement hours in the allied health sector is important if these experiences are to be tested for validity, efficacy, and transferability to a range of occupational therapy practice areas and other health disciplines.

Suggested Citation

  • Eli Mang Yee Chu & Loretta Sheppard & Stephen Guinea & Christine Imms, 2019. "Placement replacement: A conceptual framework for designing simulated clinical placement in occupational therapy," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 4-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:21:y:2019:i:1:p:4-13
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12551
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicole M Phillips & Maxine M Duke & Rona Weerasuriya, 2017. "Questioning skills of clinical facilitators supporting undergraduate nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4344-4352, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:21:y:2019:i:1:p:4-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.