IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v18y2016i3p350-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of a concept map teaching approach on nursing students’ critical thinking skills

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmoud Kaddoura
  • Olga Van‐Dyke
  • Qing Yang

Abstract

Nurses confront complex problems and decisions that require critical thinking in order to identify patient needs and implement best practices. An active strategy for teaching students the skills to think critically is the concept map. This study explores the development of critical thinking among nursing students in a required pathophysiology and pharmacology course during the first year of a Bachelor of Science in Nursing in response to concept mapping as an interventional strategy, using the Health Education Systems, Incorporated critical thinking test. A two‐group experimental study with a pretest and posttest design was used. Participants were randomly divided into a control group (n = 42) taught by traditional didactic lecturing alone, and an intervention group (n = 41), taught by traditional didactic lecturing with concept mapping. Students in the concept mapping group performed much better on the Health Education Systems, Incorporated than students in the control group. It is recommended that deans, program directors, and nursing faculties evaluate their curricula to integrate concept map teaching strategies in courses in order to develop critical thinking abilities in their students.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmoud Kaddoura & Olga Van‐Dyke & Qing Yang, 2016. "Impact of a concept map teaching approach on nursing students’ critical thinking skills," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 350-354, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:18:y:2016:i:3:p:350-354
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12277
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:18:y:2016:i:3:p:350-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.