IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v45y1998i6p615-627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the greedy approach in problems of maximum k‐coverage

Author

Listed:
  • Dorit S. Hochbaum
  • Anu Pathria

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a general covering problem in which k subsets are to be selected such that their union covers as large a weight of objects from a universal set of elements as possible. Each subset selected must satisfy some structural constraints. We analyze the quality of a k‐stage covering algorithm that relies, at each stage, on greedily selecting a subset that gives maximum improvement in terms of overall coverage. We show that such greedily constructed solutions are guaranteed to be within a factor of 1 − 1/e of the optimal solution. In some cases, selecting a best solution at each stage may itself be difficult; we show that if a β‐approximate best solution is chosen at each stage, then the overall solution constructed is guaranteed to be within a factor of 1 − 1/eβ of the optimal. Our results also yield a simple proof that the number of subsets used by the greedy approach to achieve entire coverage of the universal set is within a logarithmic factor of the optimal number of subsets. Examples of problems that fall into the family of general covering problems considered, and for which the algorithmic results apply, are discussed. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 45: 615–627, 1998

Suggested Citation

  • Dorit S. Hochbaum & Anu Pathria, 1998. "Analysis of the greedy approach in problems of maximum k‐coverage," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(6), pages 615-627, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:45:y:1998:i:6:p:615-627
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199809)45:63.0.CO;2-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199809)45:63.0.CO;2-5
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199809)45:63.0.CO;2-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco Barahona & Andrés Weintraub & Rafael Epstein, 1992. "Habitat Dispersion in Forest Planning and the Stable Set Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(1-supplem), pages 14-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yourim Yoon & Yong-Hyuk Kim, 2020. "Gene-Similarity Normalization in a Genetic Algorithm for the Maximum k -Coverage Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Matjaž Krnc & Riste Škrekovski, 2020. "Group Degree Centrality and Centralization in Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-11, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcos Goycoolea & Alan T. Murray & Francisco Barahona & Rafael Epstein & Andrés Weintraub, 2005. "Harvest Scheduling Subject to Maximum Area Restrictions: Exploring Exact Approaches," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 490-500, June.
    2. Andres Weintraub P., 2007. "Integer programming in forestry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 209-216, February.
    3. Nicolas Andalaft & Pablo Andalaft & Monique Guignard & Adrian Magendzo & Alexis Wainer & Andres Weintraub, 2003. "A Problem of Forest Harvesting and Road Building Solved Through Model Strengthening and Lagrangean Relaxation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 613-628, August.
    4. Brumelle, Shelby & Granot, Daniel & Halme, Merja & Vertinsky, Ilan, 1998. "A tabu search algorithm for finding good forest harvest schedules satisfying green-up constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 408-424, April.
    5. Wu, Qinghua & Hao, Jin-Kao, 2015. "A review on algorithms for maximum clique problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 693-709.
    6. Martell, David L. & Gunn, Eldon A. & Weintraub, Andres, 1998. "Forest management challenges for operational researchers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Murray, Alan T. & Church, Richard L., 1997. "Facets for node packing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 598-608, September.
    8. Alexander Engau & Miguel Anjos & Immanuel Bomze, 2013. "Constraint selection in a build-up interior-point cutting-plane method for solving relaxations of the stable-set problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 78(1), pages 35-59, August.
    9. Andrés Weintraub & Carlos Romero, 2006. "Operations Research Models and the Management of Agricultural and Forestry Resources: A Review and Comparison," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 446-457, October.
    10. Alan Murray & Hyun Kim, 2008. "Efficient identification of geographic restriction conditions in anti-covering location models using GIS," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 159-169, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:45:y:1998:i:6:p:615-627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.